Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: One "weak" Chess Game

Author: pavel

Date: 18:10:03 03/08/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 08, 2002 at 20:19:33, Angrim wrote:

>On March 08, 2002 at 01:05:09, pavel wrote:
>
>>One 'Weak' (week) Chess Game. (OWCG)  ;)
>>
>>2 games played at one week each.
>>Each engine will get 3.5 days to play.
>>24hrs*7days = 168hrs / 2 = 84 hours per side.
>>
>>
>>Just a thought, which is still in it's early stage.
>>
>>need opinions in these issues -->
>>
>>Which engines to choose? = Fritz7 is naturally the first choice, but will the
>>opponent be Shredder6 or Chesstiger14? (or any other engine?)
>>Or maybe after the HLCC 2 (12/side game) we can decide which program performed
>>better against Fritz7 and choose that?
>>
>>Hash = 150 is the best I can afford in a single processor, any thoughts?
>>
>>
>>Any ideas thoughts about anything regarding this match, is appreciated.
>>
>>Lets move away from the traditional chess for a while.
>
>Ok, how about you start running crazyhouse tournaments?
>Sjeng vs Sunsetter at slow time controls..
>or suicide chess, Sjeng vs OliThink.

not interesting enough for me.sorry.


>
>>Call me insane, but thats the way I am. ;)
>
>How about I call you a boring traditionalist?  Standard rules chess
>at slightly unusual time controls is not much of a move away
>from traditional chess.

I really wouldnt call 3.2 days/side a slightly unusual time control.
or even 12hrs/side.


thanks for your opiions.

Regards,
pavs



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.