Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 18:33:48 03/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 08, 2002 at 21:31:26, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >On March 08, 2002 at 21:08:09, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On March 08, 2002 at 20:58:21, enrico carrisco wrote: >> >>>On March 08, 2002 at 20:56:20, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>>On March 08, 2002 at 20:30:01, Kris Jordan wrote: >>>> >>>>>wow, not at all. It's an athlon xp 2000+ overclocked to 1755mhz!!! This >>>>>fritzmark is with fritz 7 though.;) >>>> >>>>You never said that. >>>> >>>>My AMD 1.2Ghz gets *about* those numbers on Fritz 6. >>>> >>> >>>You better check again.. I'd say closer to the 900s with a 1.2GHz T-Bird. >>> >>>-elc. >> >>Just ran it. >> >>Fritz 6 Fritzmark AMD 1.2Ghz 64MB hash: >> >>781(9.0s) >>1123kN/s >> >>I was ONLY looking at nps. That number is worthless. >> >>Don't have F7 on that computer. > >Which is worthless ? nips or fritz mark ? Yep. ;-) Actually either can be useful as long as you know the version number of Fritz and the exact hardware, OS, etc. But (as they say) the proof of the pudding is in the eating. NPS is a pretty meaningless figure. FritzMark is not really comparable even to other FritzMark figures.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.