Author: Slater Wold
Date: 21:31:49 03/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 08, 2002 at 21:33:48, Dann Corbit wrote: >On March 08, 2002 at 21:31:26, Wayne Lowrance wrote: > >>On March 08, 2002 at 21:08:09, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On March 08, 2002 at 20:58:21, enrico carrisco wrote: >>> >>>>On March 08, 2002 at 20:56:20, Slater Wold wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 08, 2002 at 20:30:01, Kris Jordan wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>wow, not at all. It's an athlon xp 2000+ overclocked to 1755mhz!!! This >>>>>>fritzmark is with fritz 7 though.;) >>>>> >>>>>You never said that. >>>>> >>>>>My AMD 1.2Ghz gets *about* those numbers on Fritz 6. >>>>> >>>> >>>>You better check again.. I'd say closer to the 900s with a 1.2GHz T-Bird. >>>> >>>>-elc. >>> >>>Just ran it. >>> >>>Fritz 6 Fritzmark AMD 1.2Ghz 64MB hash: >>> >>>781(9.0s) >>>1123kN/s >>> >>>I was ONLY looking at nps. That number is worthless. >>> >>>Don't have F7 on that computer. >> >>Which is worthless ? nips or fritz mark ? > >Yep. >;-) > >Actually either can be useful as long as you know the version number of Fritz >and the exact hardware, OS, etc. > >But (as they say) the proof of the pudding is in the eating. > >NPS is a pretty meaningless figure. FritzMark is not really comparable even to >other FritzMark figures. When I ask someone how the new "hottest" hardware stacks up, I usually expect it to be in NPS, not fritzmark. Everyone benches their software off NPS. Crafty, Sunsetter, hell even TSCP. But Chessbase thought a formula would make it better somehow. Not sure how. NPS does = ELO. In some small, fractorial way. ;)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.