Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 08:12:18 03/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 09, 2002 at 10:48:12, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On March 09, 2002 at 09:21:09, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On March 08, 2002 at 12:08:49, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On March 08, 2002 at 08:20:41, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On March 08, 2002 at 05:06:31, Chris Carson wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 07, 2002 at 20:09:25, mike schoonover wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>i can see where this thread is going to turn into a real >>>>>>pissing contest. :) >>>>>>i wish the best to gulko.he his a fine chess player. >>>>> >>>>>I do to, I have always enjoyed his games and respected his play. >>>>> >>>>>>he's the best sentimental favorite so far. >>>>>>go G!give them processers stack overflows. >>>>> >>>>>Give em hell, hope he wins and takes them down. >>>>> >>>>>>regards >>>>>>mike >>>> >>>>Sorry to say this but wishful thinking will NOT help Mr.Gulko, the only thing >>>>that would help him is if the organizer dicides to use a slow computer like a >>>>Athlon 700 Mhz. But at this time control even a mere 700 Mhz would tare him >>>>apart. >>> >>> >>>Maybe or maybe not. I watched a GM "dismantle" a very fast AMD box last >>>week 6 games in a row... and 8 out of 10 games overall. And the time control >>>was a very slow 3 0... >>> >>>The GMs are dangerous. _very_ dangerous. To think otherwise is very foolish. >>>Chess is a _long_ way from being solved by computers... >> >>All GM's are dangerous, plain and simple. >> >>You're correct, most people here haven't a clue about top young and often >>relatively unkown GM's that play Bullet Chess and often beat comps. on ICC. >>Not to say older and even some old GM's are not impressive! >>Beating them at 3 0 is most impressive! >> >>Dr. Hyatt, could you give a list of the best GM's and some IM's too that play >>well against comps. at ICC? >> >>Thanks! >> >>Regards, >> Terry > > >Any of them, really. Roman is a real pain from the GM camps. As is Shirov. >Mecking also has his moments. Roland Schmaltz (now a GM) was an IM that gave >programs fits. van Wely is another. Rustemov can do well if he doesn't let >the game get out of control. If you want an IM to watch, try Khachiyan >(dragon-70 on ICC). He can be a problem at times. > >There are certainly others that I have missed. An old one "cptnbluebear" was >murder for all programs, last name was Keitlinghaus according to his notes. >He was anti-computer to the max. Roland Schmaltz (Hawkeye) gives just about anyone or machine fits at 3 0!!:o) Thanks Dr. Hyatt! Regards, Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.