Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 08:30:33 03/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 08, 2002 at 12:08:49, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On March 08, 2002 at 08:20:41, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On March 08, 2002 at 05:06:31, Chris Carson wrote: >> >>>On March 07, 2002 at 20:09:25, mike schoonover wrote: >>> >>>>i can see where this thread is going to turn into a real >>>>pissing contest. :) >>>>i wish the best to gulko.he his a fine chess player. >>> >>>I do to, I have always enjoyed his games and respected his play. >>> >>>>he's the best sentimental favorite so far. >>>>go G!give them processers stack overflows. >>> >>>Give em hell, hope he wins and takes them down. >>> >>>>regards >>>>mike >> >>Sorry to say this but wishful thinking will NOT help Mr.Gulko, the only thing >>that would help him is if the organizer dicides to use a slow computer like a >>Athlon 700 Mhz. But at this time control even a mere 700 Mhz would tare him >>apart. > > >Maybe or maybe not. I watched a GM "dismantle" a very fast AMD box last >week 6 games in a row... and 8 out of 10 games overall. And the time control >was a very slow 3 0... > >The GMs are dangerous. _very_ dangerous. To think otherwise is very foolish. >Chess is a _long_ way from being solved by computers... Actualy by both regards Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.