Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 09:22:55 03/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 09, 2002 at 11:12:18, Terry McCracken wrote: >On March 09, 2002 at 10:48:12, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On March 09, 2002 at 09:21:09, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On March 08, 2002 at 12:08:49, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On March 08, 2002 at 08:20:41, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 08, 2002 at 05:06:31, Chris Carson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On March 07, 2002 at 20:09:25, mike schoonover wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>i can see where this thread is going to turn into a real >>>>>>>pissing contest. :) >>>>>>>i wish the best to gulko.he his a fine chess player. >>>>>> >>>>>>I do to, I have always enjoyed his games and respected his play. >>>>>> >>>>>>>he's the best sentimental favorite so far. >>>>>>>go G!give them processers stack overflows. >>>>>> >>>>>>Give em hell, hope he wins and takes them down. >>>>>> >>>>>>>regards >>>>>>>mike >>>>> >>>>>Sorry to say this but wishful thinking will NOT help Mr.Gulko, the only thing >>>>>that would help him is if the organizer dicides to use a slow computer like a >>>>>Athlon 700 Mhz. But at this time control even a mere 700 Mhz would tare him >>>>>apart. >>>> >>>> >>>>Maybe or maybe not. I watched a GM "dismantle" a very fast AMD box last >>>>week 6 games in a row... and 8 out of 10 games overall. And the time control >>>>was a very slow 3 0... >>>> >>>>The GMs are dangerous. _very_ dangerous. To think otherwise is very foolish. >>>>Chess is a _long_ way from being solved by computers... >>> >>>All GM's are dangerous, plain and simple. >>> >>>You're correct, most people here haven't a clue about top young and often >>>relatively unkown GM's that play Bullet Chess and often beat comps. on ICC. >>>Not to say older and even some old GM's are not impressive! >>>Beating them at 3 0 is most impressive! >>> >>>Dr. Hyatt, could you give a list of the best GM's and some IM's too that play >>>well against comps. at ICC? >>> >>>Thanks! >>> >>>Regards, >>> Terry >> >> >>Any of them, really. Roman is a real pain from the GM camps. As is Shirov. >>Mecking also has his moments. Roland Schmaltz (now a GM) was an IM that gave >>programs fits. van Wely is another. Rustemov can do well if he doesn't let >>the game get out of control. If you want an IM to watch, try Khachiyan >>(dragon-70 on ICC). He can be a problem at times. >> >>There are certainly others that I have missed. An old one "cptnbluebear" was >>murder for all programs, last name was Keitlinghaus according to his notes. >>He was anti-computer to the max. > >Roland Schmaltz (Hawkeye) gives just about anyone or machine fits at 3 0!!:o) > >Thanks Dr. Hyatt! > >Regards, > Terry Check him out here: http://www.hawkeye.de/ Pretty unusual for a chess person to have such a fancy multimedia site, IMHO.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.