Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:46:58 03/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2002 at 13:25:33, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >That is the proof that software "counts" more than hardware for CC. > >w.b.r. >Otello I do not see one game as a proof. It is clear that palm tiger is better than the weak amatuers but there are a lot of amatuers that are better than palm tiger. If christophe wants to know he can release a free winboard program for the p.c that is going to be called palm tiger simulator when the idea is that the engine will be the same as palm tiger except the fact that it will be slower(he can tell tiger to sleep after every new node that it generates) The palm simulator can be also limited in hash tables. I am sure people will be happy to test it and give it a rating based on games against other winboard engines. I guess that palm tiger is at similiar level to free winboard programs like averno and if christophe release winboard version of palm tiger simulator we can know better if my guess is right. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.