Author: Rafael Vasquez
Date: 19:26:45 03/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2002 at 14:01:14, Uri Blass wrote: Uri You can test straigth away using a palm emulator in your PC and downloading Chess Tiger in http://www.chesstiger.com Only thing is that you cant overclock >On March 11, 2002 at 13:46:58, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On March 11, 2002 at 13:25:33, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >> >>>That is the proof that software "counts" more than hardware for CC. >>> >>>w.b.r. >>>Otello >> >>I do not see one game as a proof. >> >>It is clear that palm tiger is better than the weak amatuers but there are a lot >>of amatuers that are better than palm tiger. >> >>If christophe wants to know he can release a free winboard program for the p.c >>that is going to be called palm tiger simulator when the idea is that the engine >>will be the same as palm tiger except the fact that it will be slower(he can >>tell tiger to sleep after every new node that it generates) >> >>The palm simulator can be also limited in hash tables. >>I am sure people will be happy to test it and give it a rating based on games >>against other winboard engines. >> >>I guess that palm tiger is at similiar level to free winboard programs like >>averno and if christophe release winboard version of palm tiger simulator we can >>know better if my guess is right. >> >>Uri > >Maybe I am too optimistic about palm tiger because averno is only 410 elo points >weaker than gandalf > >See the follwoing link that has list of rating for programs when averno has 2130 >and gandalf has 2540. > >http://f11.parsimony.net/forum16635/messages/23352.htm > >I still guess that palm tiger is supposed to earn more from time relative to >most of the mateurs thanks to better branching factor(inspite of the small hash >tables) so I guess that if the time control is long enough palm tiger can >compete with averno. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.