Author: Slater Wold
Date: 19:56:52 03/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2002 at 22:21:30, Dann Corbit wrote: >On March 11, 2002 at 21:15:53, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>Besides Rb6, at least two other moves seem to be just as good. Probably, Rg5+ >>is better. >> >>8/1p6/p5R1/k7/Prpp4/K7/1NP5/8 w - - acd 17; acn 237015574; acs 181; bm Rb6; ce >>304; id "WAC.274"; pv Rd6 d3 Rd4 b5 cxd3 Rb3+ Ka2 Kb4 dxc4 Ra3+ Kb1 bxa4 Rd8 Rb3 >>Kc2 Rc3+ Kd2 Rb3 Kd1 a5 Kc2 a3; >>8/1p6/p5R1/k7/Prpp4/K7/1NP5/8 w - - acd 18; acn 546969870; acs 999; bm Rb6; ce >>363; id "WAC.274"; pv Rg5+ b5 axb5 axb5 Rg8 c3 Nd3 Rc4 Rg6 Ra4+ Kb3 Ra1 Rd6 Rb1+ >>Ka2 Rd1 Rxd4 b4 Rd5+ Kb6 Nxb4 Rxd5 Nxd5+ Kb5 Nxc3+; > >Overestimation of Rg5+. I wonder if it is null move that is to blame? I am guessing you let Crafty go for sometime (546M nodes) and that's where you got Rg5+? Just wondering if Crafty was indeed the engine used. If it was Crafty, 546M nodes is about 6 minutes on my machine. If it was not Crafty, what was it?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.