Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: How Much Stronger is Deepblue then Todays Computers?

Author: stuart taylor

Date: 06:49:49 03/13/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 13, 2002 at 07:26:08, Chris Carson wrote:

>On March 13, 2002 at 04:09:54, Jerry Doby wrote:
>
>>It's hard to believe that anything can be that much strongeer then fritz7 on a
>>fast platform. Is deepblue 100 elo or above deepfritz on an xp 2000
>
>OK, I will bite and get a debate going most likely.  First take a look at:
>http://home.interact.se/~w100107/manmachine.htm
>
>Tony's page has the results for both Top programs today and Deep Blue.
>
>Here is a brief comparison:
>
>Deep Blue 97  2862   6 games
>Chess Tiger   2788  11 games
>Deep Junior   2702   9 games
>Rebel Cen     2697   4 games
>Deep Fritz    2678  12 games
>
>None of the Commercial programs are on fastest HW today.  Deep Blue only played
>6 games against one opponent that did not get to prepare (Rebel opponent played
>100 games against Rebel before the match).  My guess is that Deep Blue rating
>would drop by 100 to 200 points if put to a serious test.  The Commercial
>programs would be 100 points stronger on fastest HW.  So they are about the same
>or slight favorite to the commercials.  I think Rebel, Tiger on fastest single
>processors and Deep F/J on fastest mps would beat DB 97 in a match.
>
>My conclusion is that 5 years after the match, the commercial programs rule.  I
>think that the gap was closed a couple of years ago.

I'm sure you are approximately right, for various reasons, but Mr. Hyatt would
never let such an idea pass lying down! He will explain SO many reasons why it
is nonsense to say as above.
S.Taylor



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.