Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: WT-3 results, history ...

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 10:00:49 03/14/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 14, 2002 at 09:48:25, Frank Quisinsky wrote:

>Hi Uri,
>
>>Not LaDameBlance 2.0c
>>
>>This program belongs to the 3th division of the winboard programs so
>>it cannot have a rating of more than 2200.
>>
>>Uri
>
>WT-3 :-))
>I believe the ELOs are 50 to hight.
>Maybe 2.100 ELO but of course with hardware from the year 2002 with 2.200!
>(La Dame Blanche) ...

I did not say 2200 but not more than 2200 than means <=2200.

I do not know an exact rating and I wanted to be careful when the rating is
dependent on the hardware.

I am not sure that 2200 is the right upper bound and the rating against humans
may be higher

I see that crafty has 2469 when La Dame Blanche has 2145.

I believe that Crafty on good hardware against humans may get 2600 and it means
that it is possible to expect La Dame Blanche 2145+2600-2469=2276 against humans
but rating are relative and when people use numbers of only 2450-2500 for the
top free programs then I think about rating relative to this rating and not
relative to humans.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.