Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Hiarcs 7.32 Scores better on the Hedlund test than Junior 7

Author: ALI MIRAFZALI

Date: 17:01:14 03/14/02

Go up one level in this thread

On March 14, 2002 at 18:43:55, Joshua Lee wrote:

>My question is how can one program such as Genius 6.5 can solve something a much
>stronger program can't? Same goes for Hiarcs it plays positionally better
>according to this test however it is clearly not better than Junior 7 in
>Gameplay.   Can a test be designed to not only show which program is better
>positionally but also which one is most likely the best in 40/2?
Yes a test can be devised;now however I would recommend BS 2830.You should also
note that the top pogrames are very close in Strenght.And finally if you could
accept computer as playing at 2700 elo(which I think you dont seeing your posts
here ) it would help you own accessment immensely

• Re: Hiarcs 7.32 Scores better on the Hedlund test than Junior 7 Joshua Lee 20:58:13 03/14/02
  • Re: Hiarcs 7.32 Scores better on the Hedlund test than Junior 7 Uri Blass 02:30:17 03/15/02
    • Re: Hiarcs 7.32 Scores better on the Hedlund test than Junior 7 Joshua Lee 13:51:28 03/15/02
      • Re: Hiarcs 7.32 Scores better on the Hedlund test than Junior 7 Uri Blass 14:14:05 03/15/02
        • Re: Hiarcs 7.32 Scores better on the Hedlund test than Junior 7 Joshua Lee 16:14:07 03/16/02
        • Re: Hiarcs 7.32 Scores better on the Hedlund test than Junior 7 Joshua Lee 16:14:02 03/16/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.