Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 08:28:40 03/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 15, 2002 at 11:08:01, Sergei Smith wrote: >On March 15, 2002 at 03:36:16, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On March 14, 2002 at 14:00:23, Sergei Smith wrote: >> >>>On March 14, 2002 at 08:36:21, James T. Walker wrote: >>> >>>>On March 14, 2002 at 07:49:26, Sergei Smith wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hooray Shredder whipped The King ! >>>>>or >>>>>Hooray The King was whipped by Shredder !! >>>>> >>>>>The King played at top strength in the most favorable circumstances while >>>>>Shredder wasn't. >>>>> >>>>>80 games ain't much to say something conclusive but the result is conclusive : >>>>>DeepShredderIBUCI - The King 75.5 - 4.5 >>>>>DeepShredderIBUCI is DeepShredder (Millenium) +UCI2WB by R.Pfister +InBetween >>>>>+WB2UCI by Odd Gunner >>>>>Thanks to T.DchenkA for the tip about this combination of adapters. If you think that the adapters are giving the strength to DS, then you should try DS + UCI2WB + in between + WB2UCI + Inbetween + UCI2WB + in between + WB2UCI And if you continue to see improvements do not stop, try DS + UCI2WB + in between + WB2UCI + Inbetween + UCI2WB + in between + WB2UCI Inbetween + UCI2WB + in between + WB2UCI + Inbetween + UCI2WB + in between + WB2UCI + UCI2WB + in between + WB2UCI + Inbetween + UCI2WB + in between + WB2UCI + UCI2WB + in between + WB2UCI + Inbetween + UCI2WB + in between + WB2UCI It might really be stronger. To make the match fair, you can also add 64 adapters linked serially to Chessmaster. It is not fair to "enhance" DS and not CM. In fact, at one point you may want to match only the adapters and not the engines, just as a control. Maybe all the strength comes from the adapters. Miguel PS: Of course, I assume that you checked already that DS is not trying to use two threads rather than one and that the adapters are not taking any CPU and that the nps of both programs are what it is expected to be. >>>>> >>>>>I'm happy I won't need to doubt anymore about using the King or not. >>>>>The reason is that I hate to keep the huge CM8000 files on my hard disk just to >>>>>extract the OPK number in order to run The King in other GUI's while the superb >>>>>Shredder UCI GUI is just a few MB all told. >>>>> >>>>>It also implies that the way my current OS is set up reflects the true strength >>>>>of chess programs. Shredder won all championships while the King team, because >>>>>of commercial reasons, refused to take part in them in order not to lose their >>>>>repute. >>>>> >>>>>Shredder deserves the title "King of Progs" and my OS is A-OK >>>>>I toiled over my OS more than 2 years and I would't dream about reverting to >>>>>WindoZe or another Linux/QNX-like OS >>>> >>>>If anyone out there believs this post, I have a bridge I would like to sell you. >>>>Jim >>> >>>Why wouldn't you ? Make with the bridge. >>>Just like Linux to which it is closely related, my OS is UNIX based with a >>>compatibility layer that allows you to run Win32 apps. All common Win 32 apps >>>are running well but there is no VB support and it will not be implemented >>>because of philosophical reasons. >>>It can be installed right on top of DOS or right on top of the Windows kernel >>>without partitioning. >>>It supports the Opera 6.0 browser and also has a smaller native browser. >>>I use chess software mainly to test the compatibility layer of my main project >>>and the bench marks so far are better than can be expected under WindoZe. >>>The installation requires of course a few DOS commands just like any common >>>Linux distro but once the OS is started you do not need any DOS commands >>>anymore. I toiled away like mad over this project for more than 2 years, so I >>>wouldn't blow it off. >> >>I don't care what you have toiled with or for how long. If you have Shredder 6 >>beating CM8K by the score you posted you definitely have something way out of >>kilter. Your score indicates that Shredder is 500 ELO better than CM8K and >>there is no program in the world that is 500 ELO better than CM8K. You have >>screwed up something very bad to get those results. >>Jim > >Maybe you should try this combination of adapters yourself and you'll see the >King is a 3-d degree winboard.proggy compared with Shredder. >My OS is 100% fool-proof, I'm sure
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.