Author: Matthias Gemuh
Date: 09:24:35 03/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 15, 2002 at 17:59:26, Kim Roper Jensen wrote: >Hi > >Just wanted to share a position from a game I played some years ago. > >It's a position where its hard to see which side, have the best protected king. > >[D] 2r1k1nr/4ppbp/3p2p1/p3P3/bp1B1PP1/7P/qPPQ2B1/1NKR3R w - - 0 1 > >How long does it take to see that white have the better position ?? > >Best move here is 1.exd6! > >Here's Shredder 6.02(CB) analysis with 512 MGbyte Hash on a dual 1 Ghz p3 > >Shredder 6.02 - Jensen,K >2r1k1nr/4ppbp/3p2p1/p3P3/bp1B1PP1/7P/qPPQ2B1/1NKR3R w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Shredder 6.02: > >1.Nc3 bxc3 2.Bxc3 > -+ (-3.04) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 >1.Nc3 bxc3 2.Bxc3 > -+ (-3.04) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 >1.Be4 d5 2.Bd3 Kf8 > µ (-1.10) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 >1.Be4 d5 2.Bd3 Kf8 > µ (-1.10) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 >1.Be4 d5 2.Bd3 h5 3.g5 > µ (-1.20) Depth: 2/4 00:00:00 >1.Be4 d5 2.Bd3 h5 3.g5 > µ (-1.20) Depth: 3/6 00:00:00 >1.Be4 d5 2.Bd3 h5 3.g5 > µ (-0.97) Depth: 4/8 00:00:00 >1.Be4 d5 2.Bd3 h5 3.g5 > µ (-0.97) Depth: 5/10 00:00:00 >1.Be4 d5 2.Bd3 h5 3.Qe3 hxg4 4.hxg4 Rxh1 5.Rxh1 > µ (-1.02) Depth: 6/12 00:00:00 >1.exd6 Rxc2+ 2.Qxc2 exd6 3.Bxg7 Bxc2 4.Kxc2 > µ (-1.01) Depth: 6/12 00:00:00 >1.exd6 Rxc2+ 2.Qxc2 Qa1 3.Bxg7 Bxc2 4.Bc6+ Kd8 5.dxe7+ Kxe7 6.Kxc2 > ³ (-0.66) Depth: 6/12 00:00:00 >1.exd6 Bxd4 2.d7+ Bxd7 3.Qxd4 Nf6 4.Rhe1 Kf8 > ³ (-0.38) Depth: 6/12 00:00:00 >1.exd6 Bxd4 2.d7+ Bxd7 3.Qxd4 Nf6 4.Rhe1 Kf8 5.Qe5 > = (-0.19) Depth: 7/14 00:00:00 204kN >1.exd6 Bxd4 2.d7+ Bxd7 3.Qxd4 Nf6 4.Rhe1 Qc4 5.Qf2 Kf8 6.Re5 > ³ (-0.39) Depth: 8/16 00:00:01 438kN >1.exd6 Bxd4 2.d7+ Bxd7 3.Qxd4 Nf6 4.Qe5 Qc4 5.c3 bxc3 6.Nxc3 Qa2 > ³ (-0.38) Depth: 9/18 00:00:03 1228kN >1.exd6 Bxd4 2.d7+ Bxd7 3.Qxd4 Nf6 4.g5 b3 5.c4 Bf5 6.Na3 Qa1+ 7.Kd2 Qxb2+ 8.Qxb2 >Rd8+ 9.Ke2 Bg4+ 10.hxg4 Rd2+ 11.Kxd2 Ne4+ 12.Bxe4 > = (-0.13) Depth: 10/20 00:00:10 3899kN >1.exd6 Bxd4 2.d7+ Bxd7 3.Qxd4 Nf6 4.g5 b3 5.c4 Bf5 6.Na3 Qa1+ 7.Kd2 Qxb2+ 8.Qxb2 >Rd8+ 9.Ke2 Bg4+ 10.hxg4 Rd2+ 11.Kxd2 Ne4+ > ² (0.37) Depth: 10/20 00:00:14 5284kN >1.exd6 Bxd4 2.d7+ Bxd7 3.Qxd4 Nf6 4.g5 Qa4 5.Be4 b3 6.gxf6 bxc2 7.Qxa4 cxd1Q+ >8.Kxd1 Bxa4+ 9.Kd2 > ² (0.37) Depth: 10/20 00:00:15 5775kN >1.exd6 Bxd4 2.d7+ Bxd7 3.Qxd4 Nf6 4.g5 Qa4 5.Be4 b3 6.gxf6 bxc2 7.fxe7 cxd1Q# > = (0.12) Depth: 11/22 00:00:17 6770kN >1.exd6 Bxd4 2.d7+ Bxd7 3.Qxd4 Nf6 4.g5 Qa4 5.Rd2 Bf5 6.Na3 Qd7 7.Nc4 Kf8 8.gxf6 >Bxc2 > = (0.12) Depth: 11/22 00:00:25 9915kN >1.exd6 Bxd4 2.d7+ Bxd7 3.Qxd4 Nf6 4.g5 Qa4 5.Rd2 Bf5 6.b3 Bxc2 7.bxa4 Be4+ 8.Nc3 >Bd5 > ² (0.37) Depth: 12/24 00:00:52 20093kN >1.exd6 Kf8 2.d7 Rd8 3.Bxg7+ Kxg7 4.Bd5 Qa1 5.Qd4+ f6 6.Qb6 Rxd7 7.Rhe1 > ² (0.60) Depth: 12/24 00:01:33 35204kN >1.exd6 Kf8 2.d7 Rd8 3.Bxg7+ Kxg7 4.Bd5 Qa1 5.Qd4+ f6 6.Qc5 Bxd7 7.Bxg8 Rhxg8 >8.Qxe7+ Kh8 9.Rxd7 Rxd7 > ± (0.85) Depth: 13/26 00:02:50 63938kN >1.exd6 Bf6 2.g5 Bxd4 3.d7+ Bxd7 4.Qxd4 Qa4 5.Be4 f6 6.Rhe1 b3 7.Qxa4 Bxa4 > ± (1.06) Depth: 13/26 00:04:46 108222kN >1.exd6 Kf8 2.d7 Rd8 3.Bxg7+ Kxg7 4.Bd5 Qa1 5.Qd4+ f6 6.Qb6 Nh6 7.Qxa5 Rxd7 8.Bb3 >Bxb3 > ± (1.30) Depth: 14/28 00:08:23 190995kN Even HyLogicChess sees this one with tactics alone, no king safety. [1] (0.12) 1.Be4 (00h:00m:00s) [2] (-0.15) 1.Be4 Qe6 (00h:00m:00s) [3] (-0.09) 1.Be4 Qe6 2.f5 (00h:00m:00s) [4] (0.10) 1.exd6 Bxd4 2.d7 Bxd7 3.Qxd4 Nf6 (00h:00m:01s) [5] (0.33) 1.exd6 f6 2.Bb6 exd6 3.Rhe1 Ne7 (00h:00m:07s) [6] (0.22) 1.exd6 Bxd4 2.d7 Bxd7 3.Qxd4 Nf6 4.Rhe1 Rd8 (00h:00m:29s) [7] (0.42) 1.exd6 Bxd4 2.d7 Bxd7 3.Qxd4 Nf6 4.Rhe1 Be6 5.Nd2 (00h:07m:16s)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.