Author: José Carlos
Date: 15:04:45 03/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 2002 at 15:01:04, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 16, 2002 at 14:34:13, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On March 16, 2002 at 14:26:20, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>In the first game Chess Tiger 14.9 was playing without using its Turbo Mode, in >>>which it enables it to think on its opponent time to move. Now I activated Turbo >>>Mode, but I am still playing Using my handspring at 32 Mhz without using >>>Afterburner or Fastcpu. This time the Tiger was hungry and decided to grab a >>>Gaviota for lunch. >> >>PS: Gaviota is playing the ending terrible, but nextgame I will continue vs Gnu >>Chess v5.02 Est rating of 2225. > >Some details: > >Gaviota is estimated to have rating of 2170 when GNU chess5.03 is estimated to >have rating of 2150 >see http://f11.parsimony.net/forum16635/messages/23352.htm > >I do not know GNUchess5.02 but I doubt if it is better than Gaviota. > >Gnu chess played in the 3th division based on the history pages of Leo when >gaviota scored clearly better than GNUchess. > >I admit that it was not GNUchess5.02 but I do not know if there is a big >difference between 5.00 and 5.02 > > > >I think that it may be more interesting to see programs of CCC memebers and not >GNUchess. > >possible candidate is Averno I'd be glad to see such a test. Averno is not very much stronger than Gaviota, but I believe it can play endgames better. Most of the knowledge I've put on Averno is related to endgame. Also, I'm really surprised that Tiger is not getting totally outsearched in such a slow hardware. It must be prunning in really smart way. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.