Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess Tiger palm 14.9 beta2 Vs Gaviota 0.30 (433 Mhz without TB)

Author: pavel

Date: 22:38:36 03/16/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 16, 2002 at 22:29:26, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On March 16, 2002 at 15:01:04, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On March 16, 2002 at 14:34:13, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>On March 16, 2002 at 14:26:20, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>
>>>>In the first game Chess Tiger 14.9 was playing without using its Turbo Mode, in
>>>>which it enables it to think on its opponent time to move. Now I activated Turbo
>>>>Mode, but I am still playing Using my handspring at 32 Mhz without using
>>>>Afterburner or Fastcpu. This time the Tiger was hungry and decided to grab a
>>>>Gaviota for lunch.
>>>
>>>PS: Gaviota is playing the ending terrible, but nextgame I will continue vs Gnu
>>>Chess v5.02 Est rating of 2225.
>>
>>Some details:
>>
>>Gaviota is estimated to have rating of 2170 when GNU chess5.03 is estimated to
>>have rating of 2150
>>see http://f11.parsimony.net/forum16635/messages/23352.htm
>>
>>I do not know GNUchess5.02 but I doubt if it is better than Gaviota.
>>
>>Gnu chess played in the 3th division based on the history pages of Leo when
>>gaviota scored clearly better than GNUchess.
>>
>>I admit that it was not GNUchess5.02 but I do not know if there is a big
>>difference between 5.00 and 5.02
>>
>>
>>
>>I think that it may be more interesting to see programs of CCC memebers and not
>>GNUchess.
>>
>>possible candidate is Averno
>>
>>The author of faile also posted in the past(faile is clearly weaker than
>>gaviota)
>>
>>My program may be also a candidate
>>
>>Today I believe that it is only in similar level to faile but I plan to do it
>>stronger and it is going to be available in april.
>>
>>Uri
>
>
>
>It is interesting to see the progress of somebody who has been suggesting
>improvements to programmers for a long time, and has eventually decided to try
>them himself.
>
>I'm glad to see that you are writing your own chess program. I'm sure it will
>have some unique features, and that's good. I would recommend you to reinvent
>the wheel and not create yet another Crafty clone. It will not be a waste of
>time. It is how things were in the eighties, and it was a great time for
>computer chess.
>
>My best wishes to... Huh... Have you chosen a name for your chess program?
>
>
>
>    Christophe


Uri-chess, might be a good suggestion?
;)



pavs.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.