Author: Slater Wold
Date: 10:32:07 03/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 2002 at 10:31:22, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>[Event "1.Ne3 !"]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "??.??.????"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "Player"]
>[Black "CENTURY 4.0"]
>[Result "*"]
>[WhiteElo "?"]
>[BlackElo "?"]
>[FEN "3rr1k1/3n1p2/p5bp/1pRP2p1/1P6/1P3PPq/1B3Q1P/R4NK1 w - - 0 1"]
>
>*
>
>
>Building 2 connected passed pawns, middlegame.
>
>AMD C-1200 mhz:
>
>Fritz7 0"
>Chinito6 3"
>Gandalf5.1 5"
>ChessTiger14.6 28"
>Rebel Century4 1'17"
>Rebel Century4 Macheide 3'45"
>Shredder6 Paderborn 36'16" (Also: this is maybe ONE reason why
> game Shredder6 Pad. - Gandalf
> was not lost for shredder.
> i doubt that the original Shredder6
> would have stand the game versus Gandalf.)
>Crafty18.13 ---- not in 32'
>Shredder6 ---- not in 2h30'
>
>Others ??
Crafty with SE:
White(1): setboard 3rr1k1/3n1p2/p5bp/1pRP2p1/1P6/1P3PPq/1B3Q1P/R4NK1 w - - 0 1
White(1): go
clearing hash tables
time surplus 0.00 time limit 360:00 (360:00)
nss depth time score variation (1)
starting thread 1
(2) 6 0.14 1.18 1. Rc6 Bd3 2. Ne3 Nb8 3. Rc3 Bg6
6 0.18 1.32 1. Rc7 Ne5 2. Bxe5 Rxe5 3. Rxa6 Rdxd5
4. Raa7
(2) 6-> 0.20 1.32 1. Rc7 Ne5 2. Bxe5 Rxe5 3. Rxa6 Rdxd5
4. Raa7
7 0.40 1.38 1. Rc7 Ne5 2. Bxe5 Rxe5 3. Ne3 Rd6
4. Re1 Kh7 5. Re2 Rf6
7 1.40 ++ 1. d6!!
7 1.81 1.81 1. d6 Ra8 2. Qd4 f6 3. Rxb5 Be4 4.
Rxg5+ hxg5 5. fxe4
(2) 7-> 1.81 1.81 1. d6 Ra8 2. Qd4 f6 3. Rxb5 Be4 4.
Rxg5+ hxg5 5. fxe4
8 2.31 -- 1. d6
8 3.04 1.33 1. d6 f6 2. Rxa6 Bd3 3. Rd5 Re2 4.
Rxd3 Rxf2 5. Kxf2
8 4.25 1.69 1. Rc7 Ne5 2. Bxe5 Rxe5 3. Ne3 Rde8
4. d6 Bd3 5. d7 Rd8 6. Ng4
(2) 8-> 5.03 1.69 1. Rc7 Ne5 2. Bxe5 Rxe5 3. Ne3 Rde8
4. d6 Bd3 5. d7 Rd8 6. Ng4
9 7.76 1.78 1. Rc7 Qf5 2. Ne3 Qd3 3. Rc3 Qd4 4.
Rxa6 Bd3 5. Rc8 Qxb4 6. Rxd8 Rxd8
9-> 11.00 1.78 1. Rc7 Qf5 2. Ne3 Qd3 3. Rc3 Qd4 4.
Rxa6 Bd3 5. Rc8 Qxb4 6. Rxd8 Rxd8
10 20.03 1.75 1. Rc7 Qf5 2. Ne3 Qd3 3. Rc3 Qd4 4.
Rxa6 Ne5 5. Rc7 Qxb4 6. Bxe5 Rxe5 7.
f4 gxf4 8. gxf4
10 38.14 1.77 1. Rc6 Ne5 2. Bxe5 Rxe5 3. d6 Bd3 4.
g4 Re6 5. Raxa6 Re2 6. Qg3
(2) 10-> 44.34 1.77 1. Rc6 Ne5 2. Bxe5 Rxe5 3. d6 Bd3 4.
g4 Re6 5. Raxa6 Re2 6. Qg3
11 1:02 1.80 1. Rc6 Ne5 2. Bxe5 Rxe5 3. d6 Bd3 4.
g4 Rd5 5. Raxa6 Re8 6. Ng3 f6
11-> 1:15 1.80 1. Rc6 Ne5 2. Bxe5 Rxe5 3. d6 Bd3 4.
g4 Rd5 5. Raxa6 Re8 6. Ng3 f6
12 3:04 1.77 1. Rc6 Qf5 2. Rd6 Kh7 3. Raxa6 Ne5
4. Rf6 Nd3 5. Rxf5 Nxf2 6. Rff6 Re2
12 5:46 1.79 1. Rcc1 Qf5 2. Ne3 Qd3 3. Ng4 Kh7 4.
Rd1 Qe2 5. d6 Qxf2+ 6. Kxf2 Bc2 7.
Rdc1 Bxb3 8. Rxa6
12 8:43 2.11 1. Ne3 Nxc5 2. bxc5 h5 3. Rxa6 Qc8
4. Rc6 Qh3 5. Bf6 Ra8 6. Rc7 h4 7.
g4
(4) 12-> 8:47 2.11 1. Ne3 Nxc5 2. bxc5 h5 3. Rxa6 Qc8
4. Rc6 Qh3 5. Bf6 Ra8 6. Rc7 h4 7.
g4
(3) 13 14:35 2.34 1. Ne3 h5 2. Rxa6 Nxc5 3. bxc5 Qc8
4. Rc6 Qh3 5. Rb6 Ra8 6. c6 <HT>
13-> 16:28 2.34 1. Ne3 h5 2. Rxa6 Nxc5 3. bxc5 Qc8
4. Rc6 Qh3 5. Rb6 Ra8 6. c6 <HT>
14 40:00 2.68 1. Ne3 Bf5 2. Rxa6 Nxc5 3. bxc5 Bd3
4. Ra1 b4 5. Bf6 Rd7 6. Rd1 Bf5 7.
c6 Rd6
14-> 47:21 2.68 1. Ne3 Bf5 2. Rxa6 Nxc5 3. bxc5 Bd3
4. Ra1 b4 5. Bf6 Rd7 6. Rd1 Bf5 7.
c6 Rd6
15 101:37 2.70 1. Ne3 Nxc5 2. bxc5 h5 3. Rxa6 Bd3
4. Ra1 h4 5. gxh4 Qxh4 6. Qxh4 <HT>
(3) 15-> 119:43 2.70 1. Ne3 Nxc5 2. bxc5 h5 3. Rxa6 Bd3
4. Ra1 h4 5. gxh4 Qxh4 6. Qxh4 <HT>
(2) 16 254:25 2.70 1. Ne3 Nxc5 2. bxc5 h5 3. Rxa6 <HT>
(2) 16-> 285:52 2.70 1. Ne3 Nxc5 2. bxc5 h5 3. Rxa6 <HT>
time=360:00 cpu=200% mat=1 n=2291988095 fh=0% nps=106k
ext-> chk=1391843794 cap=93849234 pp=31760787 1rep=145085763 mate=
12503482 sing=175
predicted=0 nodes=2291988095 evals=3511883065
endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0
hashing-> trans/ref=0% pawn=2% used=99%
SMP-> split=24747 stop=8825 data=10/32 cpu=720:45 elap=360:00
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.