Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 16:31:38 03/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 18, 2002 at 19:24:01, Slater Wold wrote: >On March 18, 2002 at 18:17:38, Art Basham wrote: > >>r1bq1rk1/1p2bppp/p3p3/n3P3/4N3/1P1P1N2/PB4PP/R3QR1K w - - >> >>White played Nf6+...!! ...if gxf6, 2. Qg3+ etc, >> >>It took my old Mach 3 about 3 hrs. to find this one... >> >>from the Encl. of Middle Games > >Crafty 18.13: > >Black(1): setboard r1bq1rk1/1p2bppp/p3p3/n3P3/4N3/1P1P1N2/PB4PP/R3QR1K w - - >White(1): go > time surplus 0.00 time limit 3:00 (3:00) > nss depth time score variation (1) > (3) 6 0.08 0.32 1. Rd1 f5 2. Nd6 f4 3. Rc1 Bd7 > (2) 6-> 0.17 0.32 1. Rd1 f5 2. Nd6 f4 3. Rc1 Bd7 > 7 0.30 0.30 1. Rd1 Nc6 2. Qf2 f6 3. exf6 gxf6 4. > Qg3+ Kh8 5. Nfg5 > 7 0.64 0.55 1. Nd4 Qd5 2. Qg3 Kh8 3. Nd6 f6 4. > Ne2 fxe5 5. Bxe5 > 7-> 0.72 0.55 1. Nd4 Qd5 2. Qg3 Kh8 3. Nd6 f6 4. > Ne2 fxe5 5. Bxe5 > 8 1.49 0.58 1. Nd4 Bd7 2. Rc1 Rc8 3. Rxc8 Bxc8 > 4. Nd6 Bxd6 5. exd6 Bd7 > 8-> 1.83 0.58 1. Nd4 Bd7 2. Rc1 Rc8 3. Rxc8 Bxc8 > 4. Nd6 Bxd6 5. exd6 Bd7 > 9 2.84 0.60 1. Nd4 Bd7 2. Rc1 Bh4 3. Qe3 Rc8 4. > Rxc8 Bxc8 5. Qh3 Bd7 > 9-> 3.70 0.60 1. Nd4 Bd7 2. Rc1 Bh4 3. Qe3 Rc8 4. > Rxc8 Bxc8 5. Qh3 Bd7 > 10 13.61 0.77 1. Nd4 h6 2. Qg3 b5 3. Nf6+ Kh8 4. > Nh5 g6 5. Nf6 Bxf6 6. Rxf6 Qd5 > 10-> 14.63 0.77 1. Nd4 h6 2. Qg3 b5 3. Nf6+ Kh8 4. > Nh5 g6 5. Nf6 Bxf6 6. Rxf6 Qd5 > 11 29.80 0.61 1. Nd4 f5 2. exf6 gxf6 3. b4 e5 4. > bxa5 exd4 5. Qg3+ Kh8 6. Qf2 Qxa5 7. > Bxd4 > 11-> 35.95 0.61 1. Nd4 f5 2. exf6 gxf6 3. b4 e5 4. > bxa5 exd4 5. Qg3+ Kh8 6. Qf2 Qxa5 7. > Bxd4 > 12 49.38 0.85 1. Nd4 f5 2. exf6 gxf6 3. Ng3 Qd5 4. > b4 Nc6 5. Ngf5 Kf7 6. Nxc6 Qxc6 7. > Rc1 Qd5 8. Nxe7 Kxe7 > 12-> 53.39 0.85 1. Nd4 f5 2. exf6 gxf6 3. Ng3 Qd5 4. > b4 Nc6 5. Ngf5 Kf7 6. Nxc6 Qxc6 7. > Rc1 Qd5 8. Nxe7 Kxe7 > time=3:00 cpu=199% mat=0 n=264306467 fh=93% nps=1466k > ext-> chk=6246289 cap=810430 pp=180769 1rep=728897 mate=66447 > predicted=0 nodes=264306467 evals=0 > endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 > hashing-> trans/ref=25% pawn=99% used=99% > SMP-> split=509 stop=63 data=7/32 cpu=5:59 elap=3:00 > >Crafty 18.13 with SE: > >Black(1): setboard r1bq1rk1/1p2bppp/p3p3/n3P3/4N3/1P1P1N2/PB4PP/R3QR1K w - - >White(1): >White(1): go > clearing hash tables > time surplus 0.00 time limit 3:00 (3:00) > nss depth time score variation (1) >starting thread 1 > (3) 6 0.10 0.32 1. Rd1 f5 2. Nd6 f4 3. Rc1 Bd7 > (2) 6-> 0.19 0.32 1. Rd1 f5 2. Nd6 f4 3. Rc1 Bd7 > 7 0.35 0.27 1. Rd1 f5 2. exf6 gxf6 3. Qh4 Bd7 4. > Qg4+ Kh8 5. Nfg5 e5 > 7 0.74 0.55 1. Nd4 Qd5 2. Qg3 Kh8 3. Nd6 f6 4. > Ne2 fxe5 5. Bxe5 > 7-> 0.94 0.55 1. Nd4 Qd5 2. Qg3 Kh8 3. Nd6 f6 4. > Ne2 fxe5 5. Bxe5 > 8 1.69 0.58 1. Nd4 Bd7 2. Rc1 Rc8 3. Rxc8 Bxc8 > 4. Nd6 Bxd6 5. exd6 Bd7 > 8-> 2.77 0.58 1. Nd4 Bd7 2. Rc1 Rc8 3. Rxc8 Bxc8 > 4. Nd6 Bxd6 5. exd6 Bd7 > 9 4.27 0.60 1. Nd4 Bd7 2. Rc1 Bh4 3. Qe3 Rc8 4. > Rxc8 Bxc8 5. Qh3 Bd7 > (3) 9-> 9.05 0.60 1. Nd4 Bd7 2. Rc1 Bh4 3. Qe3 Rc8 4. > Rxc8 Bxc8 5. Qh3 Bd7 > (2) 10 27.91 0.81 1. Nd4 Rb8 2. Qg3 Bd7 3. Bc3 Kh8 4. > b4 Nc6 5. Nxc6 Bxc6 6. Nd6 > 10-> 31.44 0.81 1. Nd4 Rb8 2. Qg3 Bd7 3. Bc3 Kh8 4. > b4 Nc6 5. Nxc6 Bxc6 6. Nd6 > 11 1:24 0.67 1. Nd4 f5 2. Nd6 Bd7 3. Qg3 b6 4. Bc3 > Nc6 5. Rac1 Qc7 6. Bd2 Bxd6 7. exd6 > 11-> 2:06 0.67 1. Nd4 f5 2. Nd6 Bd7 3. Qg3 b6 4. Bc3 > Nc6 5. Rac1 Qc7 6. Bd2 Bxd6 7. exd6 > time=3:00 cpu=216% mat=0 n=259455320 fh=92% nps=1439k > ext-> chk=6147803 cap=828480 pp=165671 1rep=721793 mate=46247 sing >=22 > predicted=0 nodes=259455320 evals=0 > endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 > hashing-> trans/ref=29% pawn=99% used=99% > SMP-> split=1602 stop=442 data=6/32 cpu=6:30 elap=3:00 > >The SE version returns a more "honest" score. I believe that the SE version >would find the correct move first. Just not sure how long that would take. ;) Apocalypse.epd (Line 6201): [D]r1bq1rk1/1p2bppp/p3p3/n3P3/4N3/1P1P1N2/PB4PP/R3QR1K w - - acd 13; ce 117; pv Nf6+ gxf6 Qg3+ Kh8 exf6 Bxf6 Ne5 Nxb3 Rxf6 Qxf6 Nxf7+ Rxf7 Bxf6+ Rxf6 axb3 Bd7 Qd6 Rd8 Kg1; pm Nf6+; bm Nf6+; id "CCC-II No.9";
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.