Author: Jerry Doby
Date: 21:25:10 03/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 18, 2002 at 23:59:28, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On March 18, 2002 at 23:54:16, Jerry Doby wrote: > >>On March 18, 2002 at 23:42:52, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >> >>>On March 18, 2002 at 23:27:15, Jerry Doby wrote: >>> >>>>On March 18, 2002 at 22:47:20, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 18, 2002 at 18:05:02, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On March 18, 2002 at 17:17:09, Torstein Hall wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>DeepFritz (2565) - Gulko (2703) [C03] >>>>>>>18.03.2002 >>>>>>>[H,Olaf] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 b6 4.Ngf3 Nf6 5.e5 Nfd7 6.c4 Bb7 7.cxd5 Bxd5 8.Bc4 Be7 >>>>>>>9.Bxd5 exd5 10.Nf1 Nf8 11.Ne3 Ne6 12.Qa4+ c6 13.0-0 0-0 14.Nf5 Re8 15.Be3 Bf8 >>>>>>>16.Rac1 a5 17.Rfd1 Ra7 18.Rd2 h6 19.Qd1 Rd7 20.Qb3 Kh7 21.Qd3 g6 22.Ng3 c5 >>>>>>>23.Nh5 c4 24.Qb1 Be7 25.Nf4 Na6 26.Nxe6 fxe6 27.h4 Bxh4 28.b3 b5 29.a4 bxa4 >>>>>>>30.bxc4 Nb4 31.c5 a3 32.Qb3 a2 33.Rb2 Rf7 34.Bd2 Ref8 35.Qe3 Kg8 36.Nxh4 Qxh4 >>>>>>>37.Bxb4 axb4 38.Rxa2 Rf4 39.g3 Qg4 40.c6 Rxd4 41.Qxh6 b3 42.Rb2 Rd1+ 43.Rxd1 >>>>>>>Qxd1+ 44.Kh2 Qh5+ 45.Qxh5 gxh5 46.Kh3 Kg7 47.Rxb3 Rxf2 48.Rc3 Rf8 49.Kh4 Kg6 >>>>>>>50.g4 hxg4 51.Kxg4 Rc8 52.Kf4 Rd8 53.Rc1 Ra8 54.Rg1+ Kf7 55.Ke3 Ra6 56.Rc1 Ra8 >>>>>>>57.Kd4 Ke7 58.Kc5 Ra2 59.Rg1 Rc2+ 60.Kb6 Rb2+ 61.Kc7 d4 62.Rg7+ Kf8 63.Rg4 d3 >>>>>>>64.Kd7 d2 65.Rd4 1-0 >>>>>>Inthe coming days this guy will be toasted.This is not the mid 90's anymore. >>>>> >>>>>I hope you're not basing this on this game. It looks like he made a blunder when >>>>>the ending was an easy draw. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes Gulko blundered and that is exactly why humans lose chess games, they make >>>>many mistakes that computers will never make, the humans strategical >>>>understanding does not make up for the frequency of their tactical blunders. One >>>>can also ask if the draw was so easy, why didn't 2600 elo Veteran G.M. Gulko >>>>draw???? >>> >>>Time trouble. >> >> >> Obviously another Human Shortcomming, I recall the time trouble excuse was also >>used by Van wely supporters against Rebel, so what should we now do, expand the >>time control to 40 moves in 3 hrs? > >It seems you find the win convincing. I don't. We disagree, so there's nothing >more to say. A Win is a Win Airhead!! You just can't face the fact the programs are getting stronger then humans, if you want to continue ignoring the truth feel free.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.