Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 05:11:09 03/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 19, 2002 at 04:00:24, Terry McCracken wrote: >On March 19, 2002 at 03:51:46, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On March 19, 2002 at 01:44:02, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On March 19, 2002 at 01:40:23, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>Is 60m + 10s. Can this be called as long / tournament game by FIDE today? >>>> >>>>Jouni >>> >>>LOL! Probably!;~) >>> >>>Terry >> >>Gulko chose that time control and the programmers agreed >>to longer time control so the excuse of not having enough time does not seem >>convincing. >> >>The computer also can play better at longer time control and gulko may become >>more tired so it is not clear that gulko could get better results >>at longer time control. >> >>Uri > >You may be right Uri, as GM Gulko isn't as young as he used to be, but it's not >clear that 40/2 would make the games for GM Gulko more difficult, for the simple >reason he's prone to Time Trouble in this match, at least in the first two >games. I would add that 40/2 favors also comps since they can deepen the analysis too... w.b.r. Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.