Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 06:14:04 03/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 19, 2002 at 09:07:06, Severi Salminen wrote: >On March 19, 2002 at 08:39:33, stuart taylor wrote: > >>Or even longer, and even not ULTIMATE perfection, just very close. >>If so, please make it now, even if it be only 3000 elo (reliably) in 48 hours >>per move with top hardware today. >> Then that program wouldn't need upgrading, as quicker hardware will "upgrade" >>its performance automatically. And it will be indisposable even now for those >>who really want excellent and perfect, super GM analysis. > >Well, if you consider the programs of today and those back in 80's, you allready >have allmost perfect programs which don't need upgrading since hardware gets >better. I don't actually understand your point here... > >Severi I guess the point/challenge is: make a program that will only benefit from really long analysis like say 10-30 hours, and don't go for anything but the best regardless of loss in speed and primary evaluation. A program that is the ideal of if you had 200-300 Ghz computers, a program that you wouldn't even think of making today because hardware is "too slow" If indeed this could be done... Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.