Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 01:26:51 03/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 19, 2002 at 18:00:35, Daniel Clausen wrote: >Hi > >On March 19, 2002 at 12:49:40, stuart taylor wrote: > >[snip] > >>I thought it was atleast loosely connected universally, i.e. that one group in >>some place having a tournament for beginners wouldn't start them all off with a >>basis of 2500 elo, but would start them off according to standard guidlines. >> Absolute perfection should obviously fall somewhere between 3-4000 elo if >>calibrated with most of the world. > >"obviously"? :) > >Let me illustrate my point. A perfect player would approx have 750 ELO points >more than the 2nd best player (ie Kasparov) therefore approx 2850+750=3600. As >soon as a super Kasparov shows up and reaches 3000 ELO (being ~150 ELO's >stronger than Kasparov) the ELO of the perfect player would go up to >3600+150+3750 ELO. And so on. If we can build the perfect player, we can also build the almost perfect player, a player that is within the 750 elo of the perfect player, let the perfect player play him :) -S. >Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.