Author: stuart taylor
Date: 02:59:05 03/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 19, 2002 at 18:00:35, Daniel Clausen wrote: >Hi > >On March 19, 2002 at 12:49:40, stuart taylor wrote: > >[snip] > >>I thought it was atleast loosely connected universally, i.e. that one group in >>some place having a tournament for beginners wouldn't start them all off with a >>basis of 2500 elo, but would start them off according to standard guidlines. >> Absolute perfection should obviously fall somewhere between 3-4000 elo if >>calibrated with most of the world. > >"obviously"? :) > >Let me illustrate my point. A perfect player would approx have 750 ELO points >more than the 2nd best player (ie Kasparov) therefore approx 2850+750=3600. As >soon as a super Kasparov shows up and reaches 3000 ELO (being ~150 ELO's >stronger than Kasparov) the ELO of the perfect player would go up to >3600+150+3750 ELO. And so on. > >Sargon Not at all. The super Kasparov will only be able to get draws. I'm assuming that chess can be calculated to perfection and that means no losses ever and all wins when ever possible without any risks (even if it looks risky to a normal GM). S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.