Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 04:59:38 03/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 19, 2002 at 19:56:39, enrico carrisco wrote: >During GM Gulko's post-game analysis of his match with HIARCS 8, a watcher asked >Gulko to rate the strength of HIARCS 8 on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being >Kasparov strength. Gulko gave the rating of 6. > >An odd comparison to say the least, but if anyone can contrast "strength" with >Kasparov, it would be Gulko. ;) > >-elc. My personal ratings: 1 to 5/10 is "insufficient" 6/10 means only "sufficient". 7/10 is "good" 8/10 is "very good" 9/10 is "impressive" 10/10 is "outstanding" w.b.r. Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.