Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Question for chess experts

Author: Marc van Hal

Date: 13:12:43 03/20/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 20, 2002 at 15:45:47, Jeroen Noomen wrote:

>On March 20, 2002 at 15:13:58, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>
>Hi Giancarlo,
>
>c7-c5 is a typical move in such positions. If you look
>at it closely, it has the following purposes:
>
>1. Gaining territory on the queen's side and in the centre
>2. Attacking the strong white centre pawn, which (when not
>   guarded by a piece) can become an isolated pawn
>3. As a result of this, the black bishop can get more scope:
>   If white exchanges dxc5, black retakes with Be7 and has
>   activated his bishop
>4. The c-file can be opened, where black can aim his
>   counterplay at. F.e. by moving the rook to c8.
>5. By attacking the white centre, black makes sure that white
>   'cannot do whatever he wants'.
>6. It is clear that the pro's of black's position lie in his
>   solid - albeit a bit passive - position, the pieces are
>   watching the centre and a typical black plan can be a
>   minority attack on the queen's side with c5, a6 and b5 etc.
>
>All in all c5 is an active move, matching the demands of the
>position.
>
>I think with the above advantages of the move c7-c5 it is also
>clear why a5? is a bad move. It does nothing the move c7-c5
>accomplishes. Thus, it is only a waste of time, giving white
>the opportunity 'to do what he wants'. And Rebel did :-)
>
>Best regards, Jeroen
>
>Well ad both understandings Jeroen''s and mine and
And that a5 actualy costs a tempo trying to archieve the same goal Solving the
posible trouble on the c-file.
and you have the corect answer.
regards Marc
>
>
>>In the Dutch championship 2001, my program reached the following
>>position with black against Rebel Century
>>
>>[D]r2q1rk1/pbp1bppp/1p2pn2/8/3P1B2/2PB1N2/PP2QPPP/R4RK1 b - - 0 1
>>
>>It played the losing move a5?, and proceeded with the 'plan' of
>>pushing it further along the a-file.
>>
>>Nowadays, it would find the correct c5 after about a minute
>>of search, but it is clear by looking at the variations that
>>it is more due to luck and that it is still not really understanding
>>what is going on.
>>
>>I am wondering if one of the strong players is able to explain
>>why c5 is good and a5 is not. I would play c5 myself, but I
>>have to admit I would not be able to explain why it is better
>>either. I just know it is good to hit at the d4 pawn with the
>>c pawn if possible, but I suspect there is more to it?
>>
>>Analysis by Sjeng 12.10:
>>
>>11...Qd7 12.Rfe1
>>  ²  (0.33)   Depth: 2   00:00:00
>>11...c5 12.dxc5 Bxc5
>>  =  (0.23)   Depth: 2   00:00:00
>>11...c5 12.dxc5 Bxc5
>>  =  (0.23)   Depth: 2   00:00:00
>>11...c5 12.dxc5 Bxc5 13.Rad1
>>  ²  (0.39)   Depth: 3   00:00:00
>>11...Qd7 12.Ne5 Qa4
>>  ²  (0.34)   Depth: 3   00:00:00
>>11...Nd5 12.Bd2 Qd7
>>  =  (0.23)   Depth: 3   00:00:00
>>11...Nd5 12.Bd2 Qd7
>>  =  (0.23)   Depth: 3   00:00:00
>>11...Nd5
>>  ±  (0.73)   Depth: 4/16   00:00:00
>>11...Qd7 12.Ne5 Qd5 13.f3
>>  ²  (0.42)   Depth: 4/16   00:00:00
>>11...c5 12.dxc5 Bxc5 13.Rad1 Qd7
>>  =  (0.19)   Depth: 4/16   00:00:00
>>11...c5 12.dxc5 Bxc5 13.Rad1 Qd7
>>  =  (0.19)   Depth: 4/16   00:00:00
>>11...c5 12.dxc5 Nd5 13.Be5 Bxc5
>>  =  (0.25)   Depth: 5/16   00:00:00
>>11...a6 12.Rad1 Nd5 13.Qe4 Nxf4 14.Qxb7
>>  =  (0.22)   Depth: 5/16   00:00:01
>>11...a6 12.Rad1 Nd5 13.Qe4 Nxf4 14.Qxb7
>>  =  (0.22)   Depth: 5/21   00:00:01
>>11...a6 12.Rfd1 Bd6 13.Ne5 c5 14.Bc2
>>  ²  (0.26)   Depth: 6/21   00:00:01  391kN
>>11...a6 12.Rfd1 Bd6 13.Ne5 c5 14.Bc2
>>  ²  (0.26)   Depth: 6/21   00:00:02  616kN
>>11...a6 12.Rad1 Qd7 13.Rfe1 Nh5 14.Bd2 Nf6
>>  =  (0.20)   Depth: 7/21   00:00:03  1295kN
>>11...a5 12.Rfe1 Bd6 13.Ne5 c5 14.Qe3 Qe7
>>  =  (0.19)   Depth: 7/23   00:00:04  1995kN
>>11...a5 12.Rfe1 Bd6 13.Ne5 c5 14.Qe3 Qe7
>>  =  (0.19)   Depth: 7/24   00:00:05  2455kN
>>11...a5 12.Rfd1 a4 13.Ne5 a3 14.b3 Qd5 15.f3
>>  =  (0.20)   Depth: 8/24   00:00:08  4809kN
>>11...a5 12.Rfd1 a4 13.Ne5 a3 14.b3 Qd5 15.f3
>>  =  (0.20)   Depth: 8/27   00:00:09  5339kN
>>11...a5 12.Rfe1 a4 13.Bc2 a3 14.b3 Nd5 15.Qe4 Nxf4 16.Qxb7
>>  =  (0.18)   Depth: 9/27   00:00:26  16234kN
>>11...a5 12.Rfe1 a4 13.Bc2 a3 14.b3 Nd5 15.Qe4 Nxf4 16.Qxb7
>>  =  (0.18)   Depth: 9/31   00:00:34  20026kN
>>11...a5 12.Rfe1 a4 13.b4 a3 14.Ne5 Qd5 15.f3 Nd7 16.Qf2 Nxe5 17.Rxe5
>>  =  (0.21)   Depth: 10/31   00:00:52  33182kN
>>11...c5 12.dxc5 Bxc5 13.Rad1 Qe7 14.Rd2 Rfd8 15.Rfd1 Rac8 16.Bc4 Rxd2 17.Rxd2
>>  =  (0.13)   Depth: 10/31   00:01:35  63374kN
>>11...c5 12.dxc5 Bxc5 13.Rad1 Qe7 14.Rd2 Rfd8 15.Rfd1 Rac8 16.Bc4 Rxd2 17.Rxd2
>>  =  (0.13)   Depth: 10/31   00:01:40  64914kN
>>
>>--
>>GCP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.