Author: Andrew Williams
Date: 14:26:01 03/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 20, 2002 at 13:17:36, Scott Gasch wrote: >On March 20, 2002 at 12:59:58, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >> 4r1k1/pp2q1p1/2p1P1Q1/3p4/6R1/P7/KPP5/8 w - - 0 17 >> >>I get a static eval of +3.7 here, which drops a little >>bit after searching a minute or so (to +3.2). >> >>Shredder Paderborn stays around +0.5 - +0.7 >> >>Fritz 7: about +1.2 to +1.4 >> >>Crafty 18.13: +0.30 to +0.40 >> >>Comet B41: rises to about +1.5 >> >>Hiarcs 7.32: rises to about +1.0 >> >>ChessTiger 14.0: starts from 0 and goes to +0.40 >>(Gambit Tiger very similar) >> >>Gandalf 5.1: +1.0 to +0.80 >> > >Wow. My static eval for white here is -0.5 pawns. With a search the engine >thinks it can force a draw and is happy to do so. As for _how_ I evaluate it, >the major component of the eval is the white passer. However it's blockaded by >an enemy piece sitting on a square controlled by the enemy so it has no prospect >of advancing. That chops down the bonus to that passer severly. I do give some >credit to white for aiming its rook/queen at the enemy king but monsoon does not >understand the mate threat it poses. I think my eval here is just as skewed as >sjeng's, just in the opposite direction. Do you actually evaluate the mate >threat? > >Scott Statically, PM thinks this is -0.70 for White. After a minute's search it says +0.35 for white. Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.