Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 16:10:28 03/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 20, 2002 at 15:51:41, Vincent Lejeune wrote:
>[Event "?"]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "2002.03.20"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "Shredder"]
>[Black "Gulko"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[ECO "C03"]
>[WhiteElo "2565"]
>[BlackElo "2703"]
>[PlyCount "49"]
Ok some comments from me seeing the game.
The initial setup of the game is weird from a GM, but somehow he is lucky
the computer blows it.
First of all, white is toast after nxf7 but the play is very tactical.
In blitz my money would be on white anyway, but not against a strong
GM. Objectively one needs quite some analysis to proof black is won
i suspect.
After some passive shuffle moves from Gulko, played as if he was
busy eating his icecream, then gulko blows it missing a
simple Bh5 check. Somehow
when i play these guys in open tournaments, then they never miss
such things.
It seems they either need to play in front of a machinegun to play well,
or they need to get shit if they lose (which they get if they lose
from me, cuz chance a FM ends high in a tourney is like near zero,
so they gotta draw me or win).
GMs are just too lazy. Computerchess matches versus Humans have proven
it over and over again. The level is no issue here. The pressure is
not there (nothing to lose if he loses the game), so that's no
argument either.
I remember again the no win no money games from Ed Schroeder online.
Shredder nor Fritz nor DeepJunior show better level than Rebel did in
these games.
The whole difference is the motivation the GMs had in these games.
Every 1800+ (an idiot compared to Gulko) sees that after
Bh5 g6 that black has a problem over the black squares.
It would be interesting to know how long Gulko thought about Re8 and
moves like Bd5-b7 which look not so good. Kind of 'please attack me
before i might get a clear winning position' attitude.
>1. d4 {0} 1... e6 {7} 2. e4 {0} 2... d5 {3} 3. Nd2 {0} 3... b6 {4} 4. Ngf3 {0}
>4... Nf6 {3} 5. Bd3 {0} 5... c5 {159} 6. O-O {135} 6... c4 {79} 7. Be2 {81}
>7... dxe4 {42} 8. Ng5 {68} 8... Bb7 {270} 9. Nxc4 {0} 9... Be7 {57} 10. Ne5 {
>117} 10... O-O {5} 11. Bc4 {73} 11... Bd5 {45} 12. Be2 {30} 12... h6 {127} 13.
>Ngxf7 {88} 13... Rxf7 {6} 14. Nxf7 {89} 14... Kxf7 {4} 15. Bf4 {132} 15... Bb7
>{123} 16. c3 {0} 16... Nc6 {32} 17. f3 {48} 17... exf3 {66} 18. Bxf3 {0} 18...
>Qd7 {45} 19. Qe2 {33} 19... Re8 {68} 20. Bh5+ {77} 20... g6 {135} 21. Bg4 {0}
>21... Nxg4 {89} 22. Qxg4 {67} 22... Kg7 {20} 23. Bxh6+ {50} 23... Kxh6 {295}
>24. Qh3+ {0} 24... Kg7 {73} 25. Rf7+ {0} 1-0
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.