Author: Jerry Doby
Date: 16:17:09 03/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 20, 2002 at 18:56:15, Dann Corbit wrote: >Here is some 3 minute crafty analysis of the pivotal part of the game. The move >in the EPD record marked as 'bm' is actually the move that was played (whatever >that was). Sometimes, it should clearly be the 'am' ;-). > >[D]r7/pb1qbkp1/1pn1pn1p/8/3P1B2/2P2B2/PP4PP/R2Q1RK1 w - - acd 11; acn 92587079; >acs 181; bm Qe2; ce -48; pv Qe2 a5 Rf2 Ba6 Qe3 Rf8 Re1 Bc4 b3 Nd5 Qe4 Nxf4 bxc4; > > time surplus 0.00 time limit 3:00 (3:00) > nss depth time score variation (1) > 6 0.27 -0.72 1. Qe1 Kg8 2. Qg3 Ba6 3. Bxh6 Bxf1 > 4. Rxf1 > 6 0.59 -0.55 1. b4 g5 2. Be5 Rf8 3. Bxf6 Bxf6 4. > Qe2 > 6-> 0.77 -0.55 1. b4 g5 2. Be5 Rf8 3. Bxf6 Bxf6 4. > Qe2 > 7 1.16 -0.82 1. b4 Ke8 2. b5 Na5 3. Qe2 Kd8 4. Rae1 > 7 1.65 -0.71 1. Qe1 Rf8 2. Qg3 g5 3. Be5 Kg8 4. > Bf4 > 7 3.99 -0.62 1. Qe2 a5 2. Qe1 Bd6 3. Qg3 Bxf4 4. > Qxf4 Rf8 > 7-> 4.24 -0.62 1. Qe2 a5 2. Qe1 Bd6 3. Qg3 Bxf4 4. > Qxf4 Rf8 > 8 5.70 -0.59 1. Qe2 a5 2. Qb5 Nxd4 3. Bh5+ g6 4. > Qxd7 Nxd7 5. Bxh6+ Bf6 6. Bg4 > 8-> 8.26 -0.59 1. Qe2 a5 2. Qb5 Nxd4 3. Bh5+ g6 4. > Qxd7 Nxd7 5. Bxh6+ Bf6 6. Bg4 > 9 13.73 -0.48 1. Qe2 Kg8 2. Rae1 Bc8 3. Bg3 a5 4. > Qf2 Ba6 5. Be2 > 9-> 15.65 -0.48 1. Qe2 Kg8 2. Rae1 Bc8 3. Bg3 a5 4. > Qf2 Ba6 5. Be2 > 10 30.84 -0.46 1. Qe2 Rf8 2. Rae1 Bc8 3. Bg4 Nd8 4. > Rf2 Kg8 5. Bf5 Bd6 > 10-> 1:12 -0.46 1. Qe2 Rf8 2. Rae1 Bc8 3. Bg4 Nd8 4. > Rf2 Kg8 5. Bf5 Bd6 > 11 2:14 -0.48 1. Qe2 a5 2. Rf2 Ba6 3. Qe3 Rf8 4. > Re1 Bc4 5. b3 Nd5 6. Qe4 Nxf4 7. bxc4 > time=3:00 cpu=99% mat=0 n=92587079 fh=94% nps=513k > ext-> chk=3807879 cap=232635 pp=4590 1rep=205933 mate=5001 > predicted=0 nodes=92587079 evals=20997455 > endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 > >[D]r7/pb1qbkp1/1pn1pn1p/8/3P1B2/2P2B2/PP2Q1PP/R4RK1 b - - acd 12; acn 93338572; >acs 182; bm Re8; ce -6; pv a5 Qf2 Kg8 Qg3 Kh8 Bc7 b5 a4 bxa4 Rxa4 Nd5 Bf4 Nxf4 >Qxf4; > > time surplus 0.00 time limit 3:00 (3:00) > nss depth time score variation (1) > 6 0.61 0.08 1. ... a5 2. Qe1 Ba6 3. Rf2 Kg8 4. > Qe3 > 6-> 0.63 0.08 1. ... a5 2. Qe1 Ba6 3. Rf2 Kg8 4. > Qe3 > 7 1.77 0.01 1. ... a5 2. Qf2 Kg8 3. Qg3 Ba6 4. > Bxh6 Bxf1 <HT> > 7-> 1.85 0.01 1. ... a5 2. Qf2 Kg8 3. Qg3 Ba6 4. > Bxh6 Bxf1 <HT> > 8 4.24 0.29 1. ... a5 2. Rf2 Ba6 3. Qe3 Kg8 4. > Bc7 Nd5 5. Bxd5 exd5 6. Bxb6 > 8 5.26 0.24 1. ... Kg8 2. Rae1 Bc8 3. Bg3 a5 4. > Rf2 Bd6 5. Ref1 Bxg3 6. hxg3 > 8-> 7.47 0.24 1. ... Kg8 2. Rae1 Bc8 3. Bg3 a5 4. > Rf2 Bd6 5. Ref1 Bxg3 6. hxg3 > 9 8.94 0.51 1. ... Kg8 2. Rae1 Nd5 3. Bg3 Bc8 4. > Bh5 Nf6 5. Bg6 Bd6 > 9 22.62 0.19 1. ... a5 2. Rf2 Ba6 3. Qe3 Kg8 4. > Bc7 Bd8 5. Be5 Be7 > 9-> 23.70 0.19 1. ... a5 2. Rf2 Ba6 3. Qe3 Kg8 4. > Bc7 Bd8 5. Be5 Be7 > 10 56.71 0.12 1. ... a5 2. Rf2 Ba6 3. Qc2 Rc8 4. > Rd1 Nb4 5. Qb1 Nbd5 6. Qc1 Nxf4 7. > Qxf4 > 10-> 1:01 0.12 1. ... a5 2. Rf2 Ba6 3. Qc2 Rc8 4. > Rd1 Nb4 5. Qb1 Nbd5 6. Qc1 Nxf4 7. > Qxf4 > 11 2:05 0.06 1. ... a5 2. Qf2 Kg8 3. Qg3 Kh8 4. > Bc7 b5 5. a4 bxa4 6. Rxa4 Nd5 7. Bf4 > Nxf4 8. Qxf4 > 11-> 2:27 0.06 1. ... a5 2. Qf2 Kg8 3. Qg3 Kh8 4. > Bc7 b5 5. a4 bxa4 6. Rxa4 Nd5 7. Bf4 > Nxf4 8. Qxf4 > time=3:00 cpu=100% mat=0 n=93338572 fh=95% nps=517k > ext-> chk=4067482 cap=189266 pp=6130 1rep=227920 mate=3186 > predicted=0 nodes=93338572 evals=20428460 > endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 > >[D]4r3/pb1qbkp1/1pn1pn1p/8/3P1B2/2P2B2/PP2Q1PP/R4RK1 w - - acd 11; acn 93685390; >acs 182; bm Bh5+; ce -18; pv Rae1 Bc8 Bh5+ g6 Bf3 Kg7 Qe3 g5 Bg3 Kg8 Qf2; > > time surplus 0.00 time limit 3:00 (3:00) > nss depth time score variation (1) > 5-> 0.23 -0.04 1. Rae1 Rf8 2. b3 Bd6 3. Bg4 Bxf4 4. > Rxf4 > 6 0.35 -0.04 1. Rae1 Rf8 2. b3 Bd6 3. Bg4 Bxf4 4. > Rxf4 > 6-> 0.70 -0.04 1. Rae1 Rf8 2. b3 Bd6 3. Bg4 Bxf4 4. > Rxf4 > 7 1.26 0.00 1. Rae1 Rf8 2. b3 Bd6 3. Bg4 Nd8 4. > a4 Bxf4 5. Rxf4 > 7-> 2.62 0.00 1. Rae1 Rf8 2. b3 Bd6 3. Bg4 Nd8 4. > a4 Bxf4 5. Rxf4 > 8 5.72 -0.15 1. Rae1 Bc8 2. Bh5+ g6 3. Bf3 g5 4. > Bh5+ Nxh5 5. Qxh5+ Kg7 6. Be5+ Nxe5 > 7. Rxe5 > 8-> 12.19 -0.15 1. Rae1 Bc8 2. Bh5+ g6 3. Bf3 g5 4. > Bh5+ Nxh5 5. Qxh5+ Kg7 6. Be5+ Nxe5 > 7. Rxe5 > 9 17.24 -0.13 1. Rae1 Bc8 2. Qc4 Nd8 3. Rf2 Kg8 4. > Ref1 Rf8 5. Be5 > 9-> 32.76 -0.13 1. Rae1 Bc8 2. Qc4 Nd8 3. Rf2 Kg8 4. > Ref1 Rf8 5. Be5 > 10 43.12 -0.18 1. Rae1 Bc8 2. Bh5+ g6 3. Bf3 Kg7 4. > Qe3 g5 5. Bg3 Kg8 6. Qf2 > 10-> 1:39 -0.18 1. Rae1 Bc8 2. Bh5+ g6 3. Bf3 Kg7 4. > Qe3 g5 5. Bg3 Kg8 6. Qf2 > time=3:00 cpu=100% mat=0 n=93685390 fh=94% nps=519k > ext-> chk=5289176 cap=231237 pp=5595 1rep=295726 mate=5116 > predicted=0 nodes=93685390 evals=17011374 > endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 > >[D]4r3/pb1qbkp1/1pn1pn1p/7B/3P1B2/2P5/PP2Q1PP/R4RK1 b - - acd 12; acn 97816102; >acs 181; bm g6; ce -70; pv g6 Bg4 h5 Bh3 Nd8 Bg5 Kg7 Qe5 Rf8 a4 a5 b3; > > time surplus 0.00 time limit 3:00 (3:00) > nss depth time score variation (1) > 6-> 0.21 0.00 1. ... Nxh5 2. Qxh5+ Kg8 3. Bxh6 gxh6 > 4. Qg6+ Kh8 5. Qxh6+ Kg8 6. Qg6+ Kh8 > 7. Qh6+ > 7 0.51 0.00 1. ... Nxh5 2. Qxh5+ Kg8 3. Bxh6 gxh6 > 4. Qg6+ Kh8 5. Qxh6+ Kg8 6. Qg6+ Kh8 > 7. Qh6+ > 7-> 0.55 0.00 1. ... Nxh5 2. Qxh5+ Kg8 3. Bxh6 gxh6 > 4. Qg6+ Kh8 5. Qxh6+ Kg8 6. Qg6+ Kh8 > 7. Qh6+ > 8 1.51 0.00 1. ... Nxh5 2. Qxh5+ Kg8 3. Bxh6 gxh6 > 4. Qg6+ Kh8 5. Qxh6+ Kg8 6. Qg6+ Kh8 > 7. Qh6+ > 8-> 1.61 0.00 1. ... Nxh5 2. Qxh5+ Kg8 3. Bxh6 gxh6 > 4. Qg6+ Kh8 5. Qxh6+ Kg8 6. Qg6+ Kh8 > 7. Qh6+ > 9 1.77 -- 1. ... Nxh5 > 9 11.21 0.89 1. ... Nxh5 2. Qxh5+ Kg8 3. Bxh6 Rf8 > 4. Qg4 Bf6 5. Rae1 Ba6 6. Rf2 <HT> > 9 18.97 0.35 1. ... g6 2. Bf3 Kg7 3. Qe3 g5 4. Be5 > Nxe5 5. Bxb7 Nfg4 > 9-> 19.01 0.35 1. ... g6 2. Bf3 Kg7 3. Qe3 g5 4. Be5 > Nxe5 5. Bxb7 Nfg4 > 10 34.66 0.26 1. ... g6 2. Bg4 Nxg4 3. Qxg4 Kg7 4. > Rae1 Bd8 5. Rf2 Qd5 6. Ref1 Qxa2 > 10-> 35.04 0.26 1. ... g6 2. Bg4 Nxg4 3. Qxg4 Kg7 4. > Rae1 Bd8 5. Rf2 Qd5 6. Ref1 Qxa2 > 11 40.94 -- 1. ... g6 > 11 1:25 0.66 1. ... g6 2. Bg4 h5 3. Bh3 Nd8 4. Bh6 > Qd5 5. Rf3 Kg8 6. Raf1 Ne4 > 11-> 1:27 0.66 1. ... g6 2. Bg4 h5 3. Bh3 Nd8 4. Bh6 > Qd5 5. Rf3 Kg8 6. Raf1 Ne4 > 12 2:27 0.70 1. ... g6 2. Bg4 h5 3. Bh3 Nd8 4. Bg5 > Kg7 5. Qe5 Rf8 6. a4 a5 7. b3 > time=3:00 cpu=100% mat=0 n=97816102 fh=95% nps=542k > ext-> chk=5970548 cap=152919 pp=22433 1rep=375198 mate=9299 > predicted=0 nodes=97816102 evals=13798611 > endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 > >Up to here, we are basically even and playing according to plan -- black even >has a slight edge according to a short search by Crafty: > >[D]4r3/pb1qbk2/1pn1pnpp/7B/3P1B2/2P5/PP2Q1PP/R4RK1 w - - acd 12; acn 98664958; >acs 182; bm Bg4; ce -19; pv Bg4 h5 Bh3 Nd8 Be5 Rf8 Rf4 Kg8 Raf1 Nd5 Rxf8+ Bxf8 >Qf2 Bd6; > > time surplus 0.00 time limit 3:00 (3:00) > nss depth time score variation (1) > 5-> 0.19 0.05 1. Bf3 Kg7 2. Qe3 g5 3. Bg3 > 6 0.24 -0.13 1. Bf3 Kg7 2. Rae1 g5 3. Bg3 Bd6 > 6-> 0.45 -0.13 1. Bf3 Kg7 2. Rae1 g5 3. Bg3 Bd6 > 7 0.64 -0.34 1. Bf3 Kg7 2. Rae1 Nd5 3. Bg3 Bg5 4. > Qf2 > 7-> 1.60 -0.34 1. Bf3 Kg7 2. Rae1 Nd5 3. Bg3 Bg5 4. > Qf2 > 8 2.86 -0.31 1. Bf3 g5 2. Be5 Kg7 3. Rae1 Nxe5 4. > Bxb7 Neg4 > 8-> 5.74 -0.31 1. Bf3 g5 2. Be5 Kg7 3. Rae1 Nxe5 4. > Bxb7 Neg4 > 9 8.77 -0.18 1. Bf3 Kg7 2. Rae1 Bc8 3. Qe3 g5 4. > Bg3 Kg8 5. Qf2 > 9-> 14.49 -0.18 1. Bf3 Kg7 2. Rae1 Bc8 3. Qe3 g5 4. > Bg3 Kg8 5. Qf2 > 10 19.46 -0.34 1. Bf3 Kg7 2. Rae1 Nd5 3. Qxe6 Qxe6 > 4. Rxe6 Nxf4 5. Bxc6 Ne2+ 6. Kh1 Bxc6 > 7. Rxc6 > 10 45.66 0.04 1. Bg4 Rh8 2. Bh3 Nd8 3. Rae1 Qc6 4. > Rf3 Kg7 5. Ref1 Rf8 > 10-> 50.74 0.04 1. Bg4 Rh8 2. Bh3 Nd8 3. Rae1 Qc6 4. > Rf3 Kg7 5. Ref1 Rf8 > 11 1:24 -0.10 1. Bg4 h5 2. Bh3 Nd8 3. Be5 Rf8 4. > Rf4 Kg8 5. Raf1 Nd5 6. Rxf8+ Bxf8 7. > Qf2 > 11-> 2:01 -0.10 1. Bg4 h5 2. Bh3 Nd8 3. Be5 Rf8 4. > Rf4 Kg8 5. Raf1 Nd5 6. Rxf8+ Bxf8 7. > Qf2 > 12 2:42 -0.19 1. Bg4 h5 2. Bh3 Nd8 3. Be5 Rf8 4. > Rf4 Kg8 5. Raf1 Nd5 6. Rxf8+ Bxf8 7. > Qf2 Bd6 > time=3:00 cpu=99% mat=0 n=98664958 fh=95% nps=546k > ext-> chk=5365400 cap=166966 pp=22603 1rep=238357 mate=9685 > predicted=0 nodes=98664958 evals=15107803 > endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 > >Here is the fatal mistake --> h5 should be the move instead of Nxg4 which should >really be the 'am' for sure. It is fairly difficult to avoid Nxg4. > >[D]4r3/pb1qbk2/1pn1pnpp/8/3P1BB1/2P5/PP2Q1PP/R4RK1 b - - acd 12; acn 96653046; >acs 182; bm Nxg4; ce -62; pv h5 Bh3 Nd8 Rae1 Kg7 Be5 Rf8 Rf2 Kg8 Qd3 Qe8 Qf1; > > time surplus 0.00 time limit 3:00 (3:00) > nss depth time score variation (1) > 6-> 0.25 -0.03 1. ... Nxg4 2. Qxg4 Kg7 3. Rae1 Ba6 > 4. Rf3 Bc4 > 7 0.43 0.26 1. ... Nxg4 2. Qxg4 Kg7 3. Rae1 Bc8 > 4. Rf3 e5 5. Qxd7 Bxd7 6. dxe5 > 7-> 0.71 0.26 1. ... Nxg4 2. Qxg4 Kg7 3. Rae1 Bc8 > 4. Rf3 e5 5. Qxd7 Bxd7 6. dxe5 > 8 1.25 0.26 1. ... Nxg4 2. Qxg4 Kg7 3. Rae1 Bd8 > 4. Rf2 Qd5 5. Ref1 Qxa2 > 8-> 2.05 0.26 1. ... Nxg4 2. Qxg4 Kg7 3. Rae1 Bd8 > 4. Rf2 Qd5 5. Ref1 Qxa2 > 9 2.87 -- 1. ... Nxg4 > 9 9.71 1.21 1. ... Nxg4 2. Qxg4 Rg8 3. Bxh6+ Ke8 > 4. Rae1 Bc8 5. Bg5 Kd8 6. Bxe7+ Qxe7 > 7. Qf4 Rh8 > 9 18.75 0.71 1. ... Rh8 2. Rae1 Nd8 3. Bf3 Kg7 4. > Bxb7 Qxb7 5. Qf2 Qd5 6. b3 > 9 24.91 0.66 1. ... h5 2. Bh3 Nd8 3. Bh6 Qd5 4. > Rf3 Kg8 5. Raf1 Ne4 > 9-> 25.58 0.66 1. ... h5 2. Bh3 Nd8 3. Bh6 Qd5 4. > Rf3 Kg8 5. Raf1 Ne4 > 10 33.37 0.70 1. ... h5 2. Bh3 Nd8 3. Bg5 Kg7 4. > Qe5 Rf8 5. a4 a5 6. b3 > 10-> 48.30 0.70 1. ... h5 2. Bh3 Nd8 3. Bg5 Kg7 4. > Qe5 Rf8 5. a4 a5 6. b3 > 11 1:14 0.59 1. ... h5 2. Bh3 Nd8 3. Be5 Rf8 4. > Rf4 Kg8 5. Raf1 Nd5 6. Rxf8+ Bxf8 7. > Qf2 Bd6 > 11-> 1:27 0.59 1. ... h5 2. Bh3 Nd8 3. Be5 Rf8 4. > Rf4 Kg8 5. Raf1 Nd5 6. Rxf8+ Bxf8 7. > Qf2 Bd6 > 12 2:17 0.62 1. ... h5 2. Bh3 Nd8 3. Rae1 Kg7 4. > Be5 Rf8 5. Rf2 Kg8 6. Qd3 Qe8 7. Qf1 > time=3:00 cpu=100% mat=0 n=96653046 fh=95% nps=536k > ext-> chk=4171825 cap=189476 pp=19455 1rep=195637 mate=11931 > predicted=0 nodes=96653046 evals=18470423 > endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 > >Black is now on the ropes, but look how deep of a search is needed to see that: >[D]4r3/pb1qbk2/1pn1p1pp/8/3P1Bn1/2P5/PP2Q1PP/R4RK1 w - - acd 12; acn 95894324; >acs 181; bm Qxg4; ce -16; pv Qxg4 Rg8 Rae1 Bc8 b4 Kg7 Re3 b5 Rh3 Rh8 Rhf3; > > time surplus 0.00 time limit 3:00 (3:00) > nss depth time score variation (1) > 6-> 0.23 -0.78 1. Qxg4 Kg7 2. Rae1 Ba6 3. Rf2 Bc4 > 7 0.34 -0.46 1. Qxg4 Kg7 2. Rae1 Bc8 3. Rf3 Qd5 > 4. b3 > 7-> 0.65 -0.46 1. Qxg4 Kg7 2. Rae1 Bc8 3. Rf3 Qd5 > 4. b3 > 8 0.89 -0.50 1. Qxg4 Kg7 2. Rae1 Bc8 3. Re3 h5 4. > Qf3 Kg8 > 8-> 1.58 -0.50 1. Qxg4 Kg7 2. Rae1 Bc8 3. Re3 h5 4. > Qf3 Kg8 > 9 3.14 ++ 1. Qxg4!! > 9 8.07 0.36 1. Qxg4 Rg8 2. Rae1 Ke8 3. Qxe6 Qxe6 > 4. Rxe6 Kd7 5. d5 g5 6. Be3 > 9-> 9.50 0.36 1. Qxg4 Rg8 2. Rae1 Ke8 3. Qxe6 Qxe6 > 4. Rxe6 Kd7 5. d5 g5 6. Be3 > 10 16.87 0.58 1. Qxg4 Rg8 2. d5 Qxd5 3. c4 Qd7 4. > Rad1 Qc8 5. Bxh6+ Bf6 6. Rd6 > 10-> 19.39 0.58 1. Qxg4 Rg8 2. d5 Qxd5 3. c4 Qd7 4. > Rad1 Qc8 5. Bxh6+ Bf6 6. Rd6 > 11 28.47 -- 1. Qxg4 > 11 50.66 -0.16 1. Qxg4 Rg8 2. Rae1 Bc8 3. b4 Kg7 4. > Re3 b5 5. Rh3 Rh8 6. Rhf3 > 11-> 1:00 -0.16 1. Qxg4 Rg8 2. Rae1 Bc8 3. b4 Kg7 4. > Re3 b5 5. Rh3 Rh8 6. Rhf3 > 12 1:19 ++ 1. Qxg4!! > time=3:00 cpu=99% mat=-3 n=95894324 fh=94% nps=531k > ext-> chk=5229426 cap=160130 pp=14165 1rep=371824 mate=25289 > predicted=0 nodes=95894324 evals=19080381 > endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 > >It's all over now but the shouting: >[D]4r3/pb1qbk2/1pn1p1pp/8/3P1BQ1/2P5/PP4PP/R4RK1 b - - acd 12; acn 94898151; acs >182; bm Kg7; ce -225; pv Rg8 d5 Qxd5 Rad1 Qxa2 c4 Rg7 Bxh6+ Kg8 Bxg7 Kxg7 Rd7 >Bc8; > > time surplus 0.00 time limit 3:00 (3:00) > nss depth time score variation (1) > 7 0.32 0.26 1. ... Kg7 2. Rae1 Bd8 3. Rf2 Qd5 4. > Ref1 Qxa2 > 7-> 0.37 0.26 1. ... Kg7 2. Rae1 Bd8 3. Rf2 Qd5 4. > Ref1 Qxa2 > 8 1.07 -- 1. ... Kg7 > 8 1.86 2.31 1. ... Kg7 2. Bxh6+ Kh8 3. Rf7 Rg8 > 4. Raf1 Nd8 5. R7f2 Bd5 > 8 4.83 1.21 1. ... Rg8 2. Bxh6+ Ke8 3. Rae1 Bc8 > 4. Bg5 Kd8 5. Bxe7+ Qxe7 6. Qf4 Rh8 > 8-> 4.90 1.21 1. ... Rg8 2. Bxh6+ Ke8 3. Rae1 Bc8 > 4. Bg5 Kd8 5. Bxe7+ Qxe7 6. Qf4 Rh8 > 9 8.28 1.51 1. ... Rg8 2. d5 Qxd5 3. c4 Qd7 4. > Rad1 Qc8 5. Bxh6+ Bf6 6. Rd6 > 9-> 9.22 1.51 1. ... Rg8 2. d5 Qxd5 3. c4 Qd7 4. > Rad1 Qc8 5. Bxh6+ Bf6 6. Rd6 > 10 15.89 1.48 1. ... Rg8 2. d5 Qxd5 3. c4 Qh5 4. > Be5+ Ke8 5. Qxe6 Rf8 6. Rxf8+ Kxf8 > 7. Rf1+ Ke8 8. Bf6 > 10-> 17.02 1.48 1. ... Rg8 2. d5 Qxd5 3. c4 Qh5 4. > Be5+ Ke8 5. Qxe6 Rf8 6. Rxf8+ Kxf8 > 7. Rf1+ Ke8 8. Bf6 > 11 49.78 1.18 1. ... Rg8 2. d5 Qxd5 3. c4 Qd7 4. > Rad1 Qc8 5. Bxh6+ Ke8 6. Qf4 Bc5+ 7. > Kh1 Rh8 > 11-> 52.04 1.18 1. ... Rg8 2. d5 Qxd5 3. c4 Qd7 4. > Rad1 Qc8 5. Bxh6+ Ke8 6. Qf4 Bc5+ 7. > Kh1 Rh8 > 12 56.94 -- 1. ... Rg8 > 12 1:36 2.25 1. ... Rg8 2. d5 Qxd5 3. Rad1 Qxa2 > 4. c4 Rg7 5. Bxh6+ Kg8 6. Bxg7 Kxg7 > 7. Rd7 Bc8 > time=3:00 cpu=100% mat=0 n=94898151 fh=94% nps=525k > ext-> chk=4607873 cap=164006 pp=21210 1rep=295028 mate=30465 > predicted=0 nodes=94898151 evals=20474690 > endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 > >[D]4r3/pb1qb1k1/1pn1p1pp/8/3P1BQ1/2P5/PP4PP/R4RK1 w - - acd 13; acn 106493706; >acs 182; bm Bxh6+; ce 423; pv Bxh6+ Kh8 Rf7 Ne5 Bg7+ Kg8 Bxe5 Kxf7 Rf1+ Bf6 Qg5 >Rg8 Rxf6+ Ke8 Qe3; > > time surplus 0.00 time limit 3:00 (3:00) > nss depth time score variation (1) > 6-> 0.29 -0.56 1. Rae1 Bc8 2. Rf2 Qd5 3. Ref1 Qxa2 > 7 0.90 -0.56 1. Rae1 Bd6 2. Rf3 Ba6 3. b3 Bb5 4. > Bxd6 Qxd6 > 7 1.29 ++ 1. Bxh6+!! > 7 2.00 1.41 1. Bxh6+ Kh8 2. Rf7 Rg8 3. Raf1 Nd8 > 4. R7f2 Bd5 > 7-> 2.06 1.41 1. Bxh6+ Kh8 2. Rf7 Rg8 3. Raf1 Nd8 > 4. R7f2 Bd5 > 8 2.19 ++ 1. Bxh6+!! > 8 3.27 4.61 1. Bxh6+ Kh8 2. Qxg6 Rg8 3. Qh5 Qe8 > 4. Rf7 Rxg2+ 5. Kh1 Qxf7 6. Qxf7 > 8-> 3.33 4.61 1. Bxh6+ Kh8 2. Qxg6 Rg8 3. Qh5 Qe8 > 4. Rf7 Rxg2+ 5. Kh1 Qxf7 6. Qxf7 > 9 4.62 4.92 1. Bxh6+ Kh8 2. Rf7 Ne5 3. Bg7+ Kg8 > 4. Bxe5 Kxf7 5. Rf1+ Bf6 6. Rxf6+ Kg8 > 7. Qxg6+ Kh8 > 9-> 4.76 4.92 1. Bxh6+ Kh8 2. Rf7 Ne5 3. Bg7+ Kg8 > 4. Bxe5 Kxf7 5. Rf1+ Bf6 6. Rxf6+ Kg8 > 7. Qxg6+ Kh8 > 10 6.73 -- 1. Bxh6+ > 10 10.39 ++ 1. Bxh6+!! > 10 23.99 5.59 1. Bxh6+ Kh8 2. Qxg6 Rg8 3. Qh5 Bd8 > 4. d5 exd5 5. Rf7 Qxf7 6. Qxf7 Na5 > 10-> 24.29 5.59 1. Bxh6+ Kh8 2. Qxg6 Rg8 3. Qh5 Bd8 > 4. d5 exd5 5. Rf7 Qxf7 6. Qxf7 Na5 > 11 28.50 -- 1. Bxh6+ > 11 45.24 4.23 1. Bxh6+ Kh8 2. Rf7 Ne5 3. Bg7+ Kg8 > 4. Bxe5 Kxf7 5. Rf1+ Bf6 6. Qg5 Rg8 > 7. Rxf6+ Ke8 8. Qe3 > 11-> 46.35 4.23 1. Bxh6+ Kh8 2. Rf7 Ne5 3. Bg7+ Kg8 > 4. Bxe5 Kxf7 5. Rf1+ Bf6 6. Qg5 Rg8 > 7. Rxf6+ Ke8 8. Qe3 > 12 49.21 ++ 1. Bxh6+!! > 12-> 2:25 4.62 1. Bxh6+ Kh8 2. Rf7 Ne5 3. Bg7+ Kg8 > 4. Bxe5 Kxf7 5. Rf1+ Bf6 6. Qg5 Rg8 > 7. Rxf6+ Ke8 8. Qe3 > 13 2:33 ++ 1. Bxh6+!! > time=3:00 cpu=99% mat=0 n=106493706 fh=96% nps=590k > ext-> chk=8701815 cap=103433 pp=13973 1rep=797772 mate=31259 > predicted=0 nodes=106493706 evals=9733723 > endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 > >In short, I think GM Gulko made one single mistake and a very forgiveable one at >that. Namely, here: >4r3/pb1qbk2/1pn1pnpp/8/3P1BB1/2P5/PP2Q1PP/R4RK1 b - - am Nxg4; bm h5; id >"Shredder/Gulko 3-20-02";
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.