Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 11:43:25 03/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 21, 2002 at 02:40:05, Jerry Doby wrote: >On March 20, 2002 at 22:47:28, Tina Long wrote: > >>On March 20, 2002 at 19:36:18, Jerry Doby wrote: >> >>>With the computers having a three to one score against Gulko then I guess Gulko >>>is a 2 if the Computer is a 6?? >>He stated Hiarcs8, not "the computer". >> >>GM Gulko is the 64th highest rated player in the World. >> >>IMO he deserves more respect than you are giving him in this post. >> >>64 Gulko, Boris F g USA 2622.00 >>http://www.worldfide.com/fide/html/top100men.html >> >>Just my opinion, >>Tina Long > > > It's true he deserves Respect, But the Computers deserve respect also, and he >gave them very little when he said they are a 6 on a scale of 1-10, and he makes >these statements at the same time that he is losing?????????? This doesn't make >sense to me, he would get more of my respect if he was just honest and admitted >the machines are his equal, instead of feeding his ego with things he knows it >not true. It was not just a scale of 1-10 it was a scale from 1-10 where kasparov was 10! With that in mind i would give the comps (on that hardware) a 7, but then again i am not the one who played them nor am i the one rated 2600! Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.