Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 14:43:41 03/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 22, 2002 at 14:40:51, Dann Corbit wrote: >On March 22, 2002 at 14:31:24, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>I think it was a big mistake for Gulko to accept the fast time >>>controls too. 40/2 would have been much wiser. >> >>I agree with you, but I think that 40/2 favors computers too , since they can >>deepen their analysis too. > >At lightning, humans are mere playthings to a computer. >At blitz, computers dominate. At short times computers falls more easily in anticomps traps like trojans and stonewalls attacks, we have here Mr. Nemeth to remember us this problem... >At G/30 computers have an enormous advantage. >At 40/2 I think the playing field is about level. That's why I like the 40/2 , that's the fairest level for both the categories (human vs. comps) but unfortunately it takes time...and the show business has its costs. >At postal rates, the best humans (currently) have the upper hand. With the help of comps ? >High rates of speed are the computer's ally and the human's enemy. > Not always true IMO >All IMO-YMMV. w.b.r. Otello
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.