Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 12:58:19 03/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 23, 2002 at 09:53:13, Dan Andersson wrote: >As seen in: >http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=45000312 >A chess program using traditional work scheduling algorithms will not be using >the Hammer architecture at its most effective. But it won't be all that bad due >to the HyperTransport tunnels. And high bandwidth memory. A funny consequence of >the architecture is that SMP multiprocessing is achieved by having software >drivers. I don't know what you mean by "traditional work scheduling algorithms" but the Hammer will be great for running chess programs out of the box. The only way to make it faster would be to recompile the programs for x86-64, which reportedly yields a 10-15% performance gain. -Tom
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.