Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:33:49 03/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 24, 2002 at 12:54:29, pavel wrote:
>HLCC - 2 (Amatuer VS Professional)
>
>HLCC = (High Level Computer Chess)
>
>==============================
>
>Shredder 6.02,
>the highest rated program in the last SSDF rating
>list(http://w1.859.telia.com/~u85924109/ssdf/list.htm), which is a Professional
>Program, written by "Stefan Meyer-Kahlen".
>
>Home page for Shredder6 -->(http://www.chessbase.com/catalog/product.asp?pid=97)
>
>Yace 0.99.56,
>the highest rated program and the winner of the last "WBEC Ridderkerk" Amatuer
>Division rating list,(http://home.hccnet.nl/leo.dijksman/history.html) which is
>an Amatuer(non-professional) program, written by "Dieter Buerssner".
>
>Home page for Yace 0.99.56 --> (http://home1.stofanet.dk/moq/)
>
>
>==============================
>The game can be seen LIVE here --->
>http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze33v6m/live/
>==============================
>
>Shredder 6.02
>Book --> Shredder6.ctg
>Hash --> 128mb
>TB --> 3,4,5men
>Ponder = off
>
>
>Yace 0.99.56
>Book --> Own opening book downloaded from the YACE webpage, the largest one.
>Hash --> 128mb
>TB --> 3,4,5men
>Ponder = off
>
>==============================
>Game Condition -->
>
>Time Control = 12hrs/side (also can be said 720mins/side)
>A set of 10 games will be played.
>Machine = Pentium III 1 Ghz/ 512mb ram / Windows XP.
>
>==============================
>
>Game 1
>===========================================================================
>[Event "Amatuer VS Professional"]
>[Site "home"]
>[Date "2002.03.23"]
>[Round "1.1"]
>[White "Shredder 6.02"]
>[Black "Yace 0.99.56"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>[ECO "A01"]
>[WhiteElo "2500"]
>[BlackElo "2500"]
>[PlyCount "90"]
>[EventDate "2002.03.23"]
>[Source "Mahamood"]
>
>1. b3 {1} 1... e5 {0.01/0 0} 2. c4 {0} 2... Nf6 {0.01/0 0} 3. Bb2 {0} 3... Nc6
>{0.01/0 0} 4. g3 {0} 4... d5 {0.01/0 0} 5. Bg2 {0} 5... d4 {0.01/0 0} 6. d3 {0}
>6... Bb4+ {0.01/0 0} 7. Nd2 {-0.28/13 32} 7... a5 {(0-0) 0.01/0 0} 8. a3 {
>-0.24/16 1036} 8... Bc5 {-0.34/13 1303} 9. Ngf3 {(Bxc6+) -0.26/15 1239} 9...
>O-O {-0.33/14 1886} 10. h3 {(0-0) -0.26/14 807} 10... Bf5 {(Qe7) -0.45/13 1230}
>11. g4 {(Ng5) -0.15/15 895} 11... Be6 {-0.46/13 780} 12. Ng5 {
>(0-0) -0.13/16 1047} 12... Bd7 {-0.44/14 1140} 13. Qc1 {(Nge4) -0.17/15 1004}
>13... Qe7 {(Be7) -0.46/13 921} 14. Rg1 {(Nde4) -0.06/15 885} 14... Ra6 {
>(Rfc8) -0.60/12 550} 15. Nde4 {(Qc2) -0.07/12 65} 15... Rb6 {-0.69/13 885} 16.
>Nxf6+ {(Nxc5) 0.23/15 1022} 16... Qxf6 {-0.66/14 536} 17. Be4 {
>(Ne4) 0.19/15 991} 17... g6 {-0.77/13 538} 18. Bd5 {0.00/16 1305} 18... Rxb3 {
>(Be7) -0.79/13 590} 19. Ne4 {0.00/11 25} 19... Qe7 {-0.58/13 520} 20. Qh6 {
>0.41/12 130} 20... Kh8 {-0.76/12 435} 21. Bc1 {0.32/14 1019} 21... f6 {
>-0.16/13 1195} 22. g5 {0.00/15 909} 22... f5 {-0.43/13 767} 23. Nxc5 {
>0.46/12 57} 23... Qxc5 {-0.36/14 714} 24. h4 {0.00/14 264} 24... Be8 {
>(Qe7) -0.15/13 730} 25. h5 {-0.33/14 852} 25... Nd8 {(Qe7) -0.01/13 677} 26.
>hxg6 {0.13/15 854} 26... Bxg6 {-0.13/14 621} 27. Rh1 {0.19/14 118} 27... Rb6 {
>-0.30/13 403} 28. a4 {(f4) -0.03/14 790} 28... Qe7 {-0.46/13 636} 29. Bd2 {
>(Ba3) -0.06/14 822} 29... f4 {(Be8) -0.63/13 653} 30. Qh2 {(Bxa5) -0.65/15 1444
>} 30... Nc6 {(Ra6) -0.99/12 637} 31. Rc1 {-1.00/15 1096} 31... Rf5 {
>-1.17/13 621} 32. Qh3 {-1.25/15 1250} 32... Rb2 {-1.34/12 424} 33. Rg1 {
>(c5) -1.39/14 838} 33... Nb4 {(Rxg5) -1.97/11 579} 34. Rh1 {-1.67/13 2220}
>34... Nc2+ {(Rxg5) -2.65/11 518} 35. Kd1 {-1.34/12 15}
I do not understand the reason that shredder used only 15 seconds for 35.Kd1
when ponder is off.
There is no obvious best move and 35.Kf1 is also a move to consider.
I do not think that more time could help because 35.Kf1 Ne3+ or 35.Rxc2 Rxc2
seem to be also winning for black but it seems to be a bad time management of
shredder.
Shredder had time to use and the next moves when shredder used 1303 seconds
and 2837 seconds prove it.
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.