Author: martin fierz
Date: 12:47:33 03/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 24, 2002 at 12:34:05, Rajen Gupta wrote: >On March 24, 2002 at 08:54:53, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On March 24, 2002 at 06:07:51, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On March 24, 2002 at 05:45:30, Rajen Gupta wrote: >>> >>>>Obviously this call has been periodically repeated on this forums. i want to >>>>compare kg with lbs. >>>> >>>>wonder if some P4 owners on this forum can post their chess tiger marks >>>>please.(at stock rather than overclocked speeds) >>>> >>>>rajen >>> >>>I saw the results in which an AMD XP 1900+ was equal to an Intel P4 2.2 Ghz. >>>This is the reason that I don't understand why chessabase is using an Intel P4 >>>2.2 Ghz instead of an Athlon XP 2000+ for Hiarcs 8. >> >>You can see on the official benchmark site: www.specbench.org >>that the AMD XP2000 is about 30% faster for crafty than for >>latest P4 at 2.4Ghz. >> >>Best regards, >>Vincent > >hi vincent: > >i did go to the site but could not find thew benchmarks > >rajen go to http://www.specbench.org/osg/cpu2000/results/cint2000.html you'll get a list of different systems, and you click on the links to the right for the result for the particluar system. i couldn't find a page which shows all crafty results for direct comparison. you will be able to see that even a XP1600+ (completes crafty benchmark in 122s) outperforms a P4 2.2 GHz (133s). an XP2000+ did it in 102s. so crafty does run 30% faster on the best athlon than on the best P4. however, i don't know if ALL programs (including fritz) will show the same behavior - maybe for other programs the difference is smaller?! aloha martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.