Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 14:08:32 03/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 24, 2002 at 10:03:26, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >there was no jump at all. the palomino is not faster than the tbird. >If you look well the only thing that speeded up are the compilers. Wrong, the Palomino has a bigger TLB, prefetching, and SSE. >64 bits cpu's we won't see soon. > a) they are hell slow because they are clocked low > b) it is very expensive Wrong, Hammer will clock higher than the AXP and Clawhammer prices will be similar. >Even the mckinley (if you can pay it) will be only available at 1Ghz >initially is what intel says now. Who was talking about McKinley? And where did you get 1GHz? Their target has been 1.2GHz for years. >Of course you can't compare this with P4, which simply has >lobotomized its L1 data cache somehow and also RDRAM runs at >a slow 100Mhz with 15T latency. Quad-pumped 100MHz = effective 400MHz, and latency depends on the pages you're accessing. -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.