Author: Slater Wold
Date: 20:07:48 03/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 24, 2002 at 22:44:48, Anthony Boynes wrote: >On March 24, 2002 at 22:40:00, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On March 24, 2002 at 22:38:37, Anthony Boynes wrote: >> >>>Don't make blanket statements then. 7.x does not refer to Linux as a whole. >>>Red Hat has done some good things but they have also done some very non standard >>>things with Linux. >> >>SuSe, Mandrake, Red Hat. Those are the *most* circulated Linux kernels there >>are. And they were all broken. >> >>Calls for a blanket statement IMO. > > >You dont know much about Linux, do you? Suse, Mandrake, and Red Hat are NOT >kernels. Bad wording. I apologize. Most popular distributions. I am no expert on Linux, but putting Microsoft under a microscope to make Linux look better is silly. Linux has it's problems, and you don't see the people who like Microsoft here blasting it. When 7.x came out, how many people ran here and blasted it because the SMP was broken? None. It just gets old. Especially to those with ties to MS. Such as Eugene and myself.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.