Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Windows XP Second Edition

Author: Slater Wold

Date: 20:25:04 03/24/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 24, 2002 at 23:19:40, Anthony Boynes wrote:

>On March 24, 2002 at 23:07:48, Slater Wold wrote:
>
>
>>Bad wording.  I apologize.  Most popular distributions.
>>
>>I am no expert on Linux, but putting Microsoft under a microscope to make Linux
>>look better is silly.  Linux has it's problems, and you don't see the people who
>>like Microsoft here blasting it.
>
>You and Eugene started a premature and uninformed bashing of Linux in this case.

Um, the original thread was all about Windows bashing.  We were simply stating,
"..don't be so naive, Linux has problems too.."

>
>>
>>When 7.x came out, how many people ran here and blasted it because the SMP was
>>broken?  None.
>>
>
>Some of us never had those problems.  *shrug*

Robert Hyatt did.  He had to fix the code himself.  Because RH support wouldn't.
 Ever call Windows support?  They are *excellent*.

>>It just gets old.  Especially to those with ties to MS.  Such as Eugene and
>>myself.
>
>It does get old.  I run mostly Windows at home.  I use Windows, Linux, FreeBSD,
>and Solaris at work.  Every OS has its strengths and weaknesses.

I use SCO 99% of the time at my job.  I would *never* think of using it at home.
 I use Windows 2000 at work.  I would *never* think of using it at work.  You
are very correct.  Everything has its ups and downs.

>Most problems seem to come when people don't take the time learn enough about
>what they are working with.  Heck, some people find Windows hard to use.  Go
>figure.

I agree.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.