Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Calling on p4 owners to post their benchmarks

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 03:44:27 03/25/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 24, 2002 at 15:47:33, martin fierz wrote:

>On March 24, 2002 at 12:34:05, Rajen Gupta wrote:
>
>>On March 24, 2002 at 08:54:53, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>>On March 24, 2002 at 06:07:51, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>
>>>>On March 24, 2002 at 05:45:30, Rajen Gupta wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Obviously this call has been periodically repeated on this forums. i want to
>>>>>compare kg with lbs.
>>>>>
>>>>>wonder if some P4 owners on this forum can post their chess tiger marks
>>>>>please.(at stock  rather than overclocked speeds)
>>>>>
>>>>>rajen
>>>>
>>>>I saw the results in which an AMD XP 1900+ was equal to an Intel P4 2.2 Ghz.
>>>>This is the reason that I don't understand why chessabase is using an Intel P4
>>>>2.2 Ghz instead of an Athlon XP 2000+ for Hiarcs 8.
>>>
>>>You can see on the official benchmark site: www.specbench.org
>>>that the AMD XP2000 is about 30% faster for crafty than for
>>>latest P4 at 2.4Ghz.
>>>
>>>Best regards,
>>>Vincent
>>
>>hi vincent:
>>
>>i did go to the site but could not find thew benchmarks
>>
>>rajen
>
>go to
>
>http://www.specbench.org/osg/cpu2000/results/cint2000.html
>
>you'll get a list of different systems, and you click on the links to the right
>for the result for the particluar system. i couldn't find a page which shows all
>crafty results for direct comparison. you will be able to see that even a
>XP1600+ (completes crafty benchmark in 122s) outperforms a P4 2.2 GHz (133s).
>an XP2000+ did it in 102s.
>so crafty does run 30% faster on the best athlon than on the best P4. however, i
>don't know if ALL programs (including fritz) will show the same behavior - maybe
>for other programs the difference is smaller?!

Crafty is a very GOOD example of how programs behave. Exceptions
are old 16 bits programs like Schach, Kallisto and such. Those aren't
used. All other programs are 32 bits optimized.

Fritz is not a standard program of course, it is completely written
in assembly and gets optimized for P4 soon i guess. Which means it
will run still horrible on the P4 but less horrible than others.

>aloha
>  martin



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.