Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hammer info. And som SMP musings.

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 05:08:44 03/25/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 24, 2002 at 17:08:32, Tom Kerrigan wrote:

>On March 24, 2002 at 10:03:26, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>there was no jump at all. the palomino is not faster than the tbird.
>>If you look well the only thing that speeded up are the compilers.
>
>Wrong, the Palomino has a bigger TLB, prefetching, and SSE.

Using the same compiler i do not see speed difference between
palomino and tbird for DIEP, so this TLB, prefetching is
not influencing my program a lot. Nor is it for crafty.

Newer compilers are that 10-15% most people speak about. The 2% speedup
diep has now is from adding a processor pack to the compiler. Not from
the MPs i run at now :)

SSE i'm not using of course, i'm not an assembly freak.

>
>>64 bits cpu's we won't see soon.
>> a) they are hell slow because they are clocked low
>> b) it is very expensive
>
>Wrong, Hammer will clock higher than the AXP and Clawhammer prices will be
>similar.

When did the 64 bits hype start, 1994?

It's 2002 now and we won't see a hammer in the shops before 2003.

>>Even the mckinley (if you can pay it) will be only available at 1Ghz
>>initially is what intel says now.
>
>Who was talking about McKinley? And where did you get 1GHz? Their target has
>been 1.2GHz for years.

Exactly why i mentionned it, it's recently shifted to 1Ghz.

>>Of course you can't compare this with P4, which simply has
>>lobotomized its L1 data cache somehow and also RDRAM runs at
>>a slow 100Mhz with 15T latency.

>Quad-pumped 100MHz = effective 400MHz, and latency depends on the pages you're
>accessing.

Not a single chessprogram that i know is busy with sequential things,
yours is?

Only latency is important and that's 100Mhz simply. RDRAM is hell slow
for me. Even if you pump it 16 times it still is 100Mhz latency for me.

That the bandwidth is bigger *theoretically* (not practically as
tests indicate) than DDR ram, that's not my worry, but gives hope
for the future.

>-Tom

Best regards,
Vincent



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.