Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:45:33 03/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 25, 2002 at 09:37:53, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 25, 2002 at 07:24:53, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On March 25, 2002 at 07:21:46, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>[...] under the Shredder interface [...] >> >>I mean the 'Classic' interface, not the standard ChessBase one. >> >>-- >>GCP > >Did the ssdf use the classic interface? > >If I remember correctly they used the standard chessbase interface >and I saw no evidence that the chessbase book is worse. > >I think that shredder.ctg should be good for shredder >(otherwise there is no reason for the name). > >I believe that the main reason that >shredder does good results in world championships is better >preperation for the specific opponents and not better public book. > >Uri > I can add that I remember that harald faber tested shredder with the "optimized tournament book" on the classic interface and also with the chessbase book and based on his results the chessbase book seems to be better for shredder. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.