Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 14:15:54 03/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 25, 2002 at 14:10:27, Art Basham wrote: >Hi Tom, >Again, I think there are too many good posibilities here to make >"h4" a good test move..etc. > >Some of the engines i tested did not prefer Bh3 even on the following >move....even if >h4 and another move was entered beforehand...:-) > >There are many good positional moves here...i think. > > >a good test move should be more obvious for most of the engines to find, >..:-) > >best regards, >ab No, in the positional field you don´t have this easy work for the tester with this wanted experience "oh year, now its so clear".The tester has to be a lot of chessknowledge to see the small advantages of the move, or he trust in the teacher.My advice, trust in the teacher.One time you will see he is right because he knows much more as you about this position.If you don´t want to understand this than programs will never make progress in positional play.Differences in the positional field are very small and we need the trust in the knownledge of chessgrandmasters. best regards TL
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.