Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 21:18:45 03/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 25, 2002 at 15:06:30, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On March 25, 2002 at 08:08:44, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>Using the same compiler i do not see speed difference between >>palomino and tbird for DIEP, so this TLB, prefetching is > >Who cares about Diep? > >>>Wrong, Hammer will clock higher than the AXP and Clawhammer prices will be >>>similar. >>When did the 64 bits hype start, 1994? >>It's 2002 now and we won't see a hammer in the shops before 2003. > >Yes, we will, and 64-bit processors have been around since the early 90s, why? > >>>Who was talking about McKinley? And where did you get 1GHz? Their target has >>>been 1.2GHz for years. >>Exactly why i mentionned it, it's recently shifted to 1Ghz. > >Reference? > >>Not a single chessprogram that i know is busy with sequential things, >>yours is? >>Only latency is important and that's 100Mhz simply. RDRAM is hell slow > >My program isn't "busy" with either. How many times does your program go to main >memory per node?? > >-Tom That would actually be interesting info for _any_ program. One day I am going to tap into the hardware performance registers and capture this kind of info, since no one really knows...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.