Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:53:00 03/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 26, 2002 at 05:33:28, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >On March 26, 2002 at 03:47:49, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On March 26, 2002 at 03:31:21, Mark Schreiber wrote: >> >>>Now that GM Gulko has lost, does he want a rematch at slower time controls? >> >>Does he believe that he can perform better at slower time control? >> >>Remember that at slower time control he may be more tired >>when the machine does not get tired. >> >>It is not obvious that slower time control >>always help humans more than the machine and >>it may be dependent on the human. >> >>Uri > >Are you a comedian? > >Humans need time to see the tactics ,to make a plan and to refresh in the game >by making nothing and don´t care about the chessclock. > >TL I believe that 2 hours/40 moves help most humans to perform better against computers relative to the time control that Gulko played but I am careful not to do generalizations about it. Gulko chose the time control in the match and not a slower time control so one of the possible reasons to consider is that he may believe that slower time control is not going to give him better chances. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.