Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 06:16:19 03/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 26, 2002 at 08:45:55, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 26, 2002 at 07:54:45, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On March 26, 2002 at 02:29:39, pavel wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> If I want set up a match game that will go for 7 days with 3.5days for each >>>opponent that is 10080/2 = 5040mins, how do I setup this under chessbase >>>interface? The limitation seems to be 999min under blitz. >>>Is there any other way I could setup the time control, that would replicate such >>>an attempt? >>> >>>thanks >>>pavs >> >>don't forget to use tournament book and the right book. > >Shredder is leading 2-1 against yace and it proves that the book that is used is >good enough for shredder. > >I saw no evidence that shredder gets more points with the "right book" and I do >not expect the shredder team to release the right book that help them to win >almost every world championship. > >Harald Faber already played games with the 'right' book and shredder's results >were not better. > >Uri this is utter nonsense all, shredder never opened 1.b3 in world champs nor any other tournament. i saw a game where shredder played this 1.b3?? i played myself when i was around 2100 rated the opening 1.b3 for some time and i can assure you it is a straight loss for white if you play also 2.bb2. Note i also tried 1.a3 and 1.b4 a lot. Same problems. Now you want us to believe that 1.b3 is not so bad, despite that it has 0.3% chance to get played (which means it in principle gets never played) and in the shredder6.ctg it has 3% chance to get played. Please don't do as if we are idiots, because we aren't. I for sure am not. 1.b3 is suicidal opening. You are defending now this suicidal opening, why? Please show us your wins in corr games with 1.b3 Best regards, Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.