Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 07:48:12 03/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 25, 2002 at 21:34:09, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On March 25, 2002 at 18:12:19, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>On March 25, 2002 at 09:31:06, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>OK... first let's stick with the 600mhz 21264 before going to the 1ghz >>>version, since I have actual data from that processor. Do you think that >>>XP will do 800K? I don't. Dual 1.4 athlons did about 1M nodes per sec >>>last time I tried. Dual 600 alphas did 1.2M. The 1ghz parts are faster but >>>I have not actually run on them personally, and only have a small bit of data >>>from others that have. >> >>On my AthlonXP at around 1700MHz (slightly overclocked), I was getting very near >>1M NPS in Crafty 18.12 bench. Dual 1.67(?)Ghz AthlonXPs run Crafty at 1.5M NPS >>or so, according to Slater. > > bloody nonsense bob. if dec-Alpha had a 600Mhz machine that could do 800k nps on crafty, they would of course already have posted the result on specbench.org and would sell it at a huge profit, knowing you're in specint2000. note we talk about years ago, Tim Mann is working by now at VMWARE for a pretty long time. i remember he was running a dual 667Mhz or something, and didn't want to reveal what cpu it was as it was classified. >Correct, but you have to factor out the gcc vs MSVC advantage since both of the >tests I quoted were with GCC... > >That changes things a bit. And remember, we are talking about a 600mhz >processor here...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.