Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 13:18:35 03/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 26, 2002 at 16:01:47, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 26, 2002 at 13:56:41, Andrew R. Case wrote: > >>Exactly the point I wanted to make, if the programs played numerous games >>against GMs, the GMs would eventualy find a way to beat them on a regular basis. >>Also I would be willing to bet that the programs used in the Gulko match are not >>the same versions(with the exception of Shredder) that most people have, and >>certainly not the same opening books. > >I see no problem with it. > >The program and the book should not be available in order to prevent unfair >advantage. > >I am sure that if Gulko becomes commercial and everybody can buy it and play >against it when the real gulko knows nothing about the games then Gulko's elo is >going to be smaller but it is not fair. > >If we want to know the real elo of programs then the programs should not be >commercial and the program should have the right to learn from the programmer Then you know the elo of the programmer+program, not the elo of the program. I might even grant that. But the program should be playing in the circuit for a long time. Not just a tournament and a couple of 1hr games. Miguel >between the games(humans also learn from other people between games). > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.