Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 13:18:59 03/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 26, 2002 at 07:48:10, Rex wrote: >What this means is that Computers did_not loose_any_game. A first grader will >tell you that would most likely mean computers had the upper hand ver. Gulko. > >Remember computers undefeated...Gulko WINLESS!! think about it. Exactly. That is my point. To a first grader it seems obvious. To the general non-chess playing public it seems obvious that computers are better than any human. My point is that I don't think it is so obvious when you analyze the situation. There have been a limited number of events in which humans who have little experience against computers have lost by small margins. It's not so obvious, that's my point. Russell
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.