Author: Joshua Lee
Date: 07:24:30 03/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 26, 2002 at 14:42:40, Dann Corbit wrote: >On March 26, 2002 at 14:17:53, Peter Hegger wrote: > >>Hello, >>If Gulko beats Shredder today, the comps will still have a 5-3 score and a >>combined TPR of 2697. >>If its a draw today, 5.5 - 2.5 = a 2738 TPR for the comps. >>If Shredder wins today, 6-2 = a 2792 TPR for the comps for the 8 game series. >>Granted, its not 40/2, but even at 60 10 its still a very impressive performance >>by the machines. > >If Gulko had played against 5 human players would we conglomerate their ELO? Is their a way to figure from TPR of 60 minute games and then compare through additional levels of search what The computer's strenth would be at 40/2 or Correspondence? What about figuring from this what the TPR would be after 25 Consecutive games, and How to Scale the GM's Strenth when he or she is Given more time? My guess is that at 60 10 Gulko was using 60 seconds per move which is usual : 5sec 5min game, 10 sec 10 minute game etc... so Does this mean the GM is searching 1 extra ply as well as the computers with the additional time going from 60 sec to 180? How about 3 days per move? 259200seconds 7 more ply? But since the first 10-20 moves will be book , 6 minutes for 40/2 so will the GM play 180elo better or less cause it isn't very clear how much you get for trippling the speed above 2000elo. As you can probably tell i am being cynical.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.