Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 12:55:09 03/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 27, 2002 at 12:11:25, Roy Eassa wrote: >On March 27, 2002 at 12:06:25, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: > >>On March 26, 2002 at 17:33:03, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On March 26, 2002 at 17:21:42, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>GM Gulko is known not to loose too many games with white, he can keep up a >>>>rating of over 2700 even against Kasparov he has a winning record, but with the >>>>black pieces his record is below 2525. >>> >>>I wish they would run the contest again. I would like to see how much he has >>>learned from the first pass. >>He has learned nothing ;GMs play lousy chess compared to machines. > > >Maybe, but a grandmaster in his mid 50s managed to score 37.5% against top PC >programs in relatively fast games (winning against the "super" Shredder in the >process). I'd say mankind is still in the game! Quite Right! I'm afraid I may have not been so informative and kind in my response. It's annoying to read nonsense from trolls. Instead I may have replied, "You're a weak player who never learns, and is so blinded by purile emotion, that you can't assimilate the actual data that is sitting right before you, obvious to any reasonable person." "I just see sour grapes if your model the "Chess Universe" crumbles before you, only to find you're at it's lowest end of it's spectrum; not able to accept this you go and stomp in your corner, making alot of noise, nothing more!" I'm glad you repiled and not me Roy!;~) Terry P.S. Excellent analysis of Rxg7+!!, I didn't go through every line so meticulously! Very Good! Just deep enough to see White was mating, but I was tired!;)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.