Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:08:23 03/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 27, 2002 at 15:09:05, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >As i have read in theses messages;You believe that Current programs >are stronger than the 1997 Deeper Blue.Since that was a dedicated machine not a >program that can be run on different Computers I have the following questions. > 1.What Elo would the 1997 version of Deep Blue get on the SSDF >(this is a hypothetical question;that is if SSDF tested Deep Blue.) I guess that 2700 and I assume in this reply that hsu modifies deeper blue to have learning. > 2.Same question for the 1996 version. I guess 2630 with the same assumptions. > 3.How important is pruning? Why or why not do the current programs >have better pruning than Deep Blue? pruning is important and I guess that the main disadvantage of deeper blue is the fact that they did not prune like the top programs of today and did some extensions that wer counter productive. > 4.If current programs (shredder 2715 Elo on 1200 Mhz For example) >are indeed sronger than Deep Blue 1997;What specifically makes them stronger? Better pruning and extension rules and better evaluation function. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.