Author: Slater Wold
Date: 06:25:56 03/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 28, 2002 at 03:30:50, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: >Hi, > >I'll try to make my point from the "Hyatt" threat clear one last time. In the >subject you put the TOPIC of your message. The way you did it > >1) you confuse people who think the _topic_ was Dr.Hyatt >2) you show disrespect to others, whos replies you dont seem to value as much. >If you just want a reply from Dr.Hyatt MAIL him. >3) you show disrespect to Dr.Hyatt, who you call like "Rex" (dont tell me he >didnt mind, thats not the point. There is a difference between objective >disrespect (meaning how most people would see it) and how the person understands >it) > >And dont tell me Dr.Hyatt wouldnt hae read a message with "T.A. Marsland" in the >subject! > >I hope my post was a good bad example of how NOT to do it. I appologize for it. > >Georg Geez Georg. I am terribly sorry you are so upset over this. I really apologize. #1.) I don't have e-mail at work. Only the internet. #2.) While I was pleased to get info from anyone, Hyatt was the only one I *really* knew, who actually knows Tony. That's why I directed the question at him, however, appreciated any responses. #3.) I was in a huge hurry. The topic should have been "Question to Hyatt", but it ended up being just "Hyatt" in my rush. In the States, it's pretty common to call someone by their last name. *Very* common. While I don't understand why this deserves another thread, or why this could not be e-mailed, I am very sorry to anyone I have offended. That was not my intent.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.